Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nevada Agricultural Foundation

Provide scholarships and recognition awards to individuals achieving excellence in agricultural industries and to youth groups providing agricultural education achievements.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Education$116kFood & Nutrition$31kAnimals$2k
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$2,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO$14,250
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO$5,000
UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES$4,500
UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES$3,500
UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES$3,000
WEST TEXAS A&M$2,750
UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES$2,500
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500
NEBRASKA COLLEGE OF TECHNICAL AGRICULTURE$2,500
FEATHER RIVER COLLEGE$2,500
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $1k → 15%NEBRASKA COLLEGE OF TECHNICAL AGRICULTURE: $3k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $6k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $2k → 11%MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 10%MONTANA WESTERN: $2k → 12%FEATHER RIVER COLLEGE: $3k → 13%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%WEST TEXAS A&M: $4k → 9%TEXAS A&M: $1k → 22%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%SOUTHWEST OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 17%TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%BYU - IDAHO: $5k → 8%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%SKAGIT VALLEY COLLEGE: $1k → 11%TRUCKEE MEADOWS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 10%NEBRASKA COLLEGE OF TECHNICAL AGRICULTURE: $1k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $2k → 11%MONTANA WESTERN: $1k → 12%FEATHER RIVER COLLEGE: $1k → 13%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%WEST TEXAS A&M: $3k → 9%TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%BYU - IDAHO: $3k → 8%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY: $1k → 13%SKAGIT VALLEY COLLEGE: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO: $15k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO: $14k → 10%UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $10k → 10%UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $6k → 10%UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $5k → 10%UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $4k → 10%UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $3k → 10%UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $3k → 10%NEVADA FARM BUREAU: $2k → 10%NEVADA FARM BUREAU: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
NY
OR
NV
WY
CA
UT
CO
NE
AZ
TN
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$137k · 18 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$137k
$10k

Still filing today

11%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO
    2× · 2023–2024 · $29k
  • UO
    UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $29k
  • US
    UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k

Funded once

  • CS
    COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • MS
    MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
2/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO: $28,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENOUNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $28,500 · OtherUNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCESUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $15,750 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $11,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IDAHOIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherWEST TEXAS A&M: $6,750 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · OtherOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Other+16 more: $34,956 · Other+16 moreCornell University: $3,500 · EducationTREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · Education
Other$143,206Education$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCornell University: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nevada Agricultural Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nevada Agricultural Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nevada Agricultural’s filings →

    More from the funding graph