Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nevada Agricultural Foundation

Provide scholarships and recognition awards to individuals achieving excellence in agricultural industries and to youth groups providing agricultural education achievements.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Education$116kFood & Nutrition$31kAnimals$2k
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$2,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO$14,250
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO$5,000
UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES$4,500
UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES$3,500
UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES$3,000
WEST TEXAS A&M$2,750
FEATHER RIVER COLLEGE$2,500
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$2,500
UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES$2,500
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
NEBRASKA COLLEGE OF TECHNICAL AGRICULTURE$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $1k → 15%NEBRASKA COLLEGE OF TECHNICAL AGRICULTURE: $3k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $6k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $2k → 11%MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 10%MONTANA WESTERN: $2k → 12%FEATHER RIVER COLLEGE: $3k → 13%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%WEST TEXAS A&M: $4k → 9%TEXAS A&M: $1k → 22%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%SOUTHWEST OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 17%TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%BYU - IDAHO: $5k → 8%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%SKAGIT VALLEY COLLEGE: $1k → 11%TRUCKEE MEADOWS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 10%NEBRASKA COLLEGE OF TECHNICAL AGRICULTURE: $1k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $2k → 11%MONTANA WESTERN: $1k → 12%FEATHER RIVER COLLEGE: $1k → 13%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%WEST TEXAS A&M: $3k → 9%TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%BYU - IDAHO: $3k → 8%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 12%SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY: $1k → 13%SKAGIT VALLEY COLLEGE: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO: $15k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO: $14k → 10%UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $10k → 10%UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $6k → 10%UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $5k → 10%UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $4k → 10%UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $3k → 10%UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES: $3k → 10%NEVADA FARM BUREAU: $2k → 10%NEVADA FARM BUREAU: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
NY
OR
NV
WY
CA
UT
CO
NE
AZ
TN
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$137k · 18 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$137k
$10k

Still filing today

11%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO
    2× · 2023–2024 · $29k
  • UO
    UNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $29k
  • US
    UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k

Funded once

  • CS
    COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • MS
    MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
2/2
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO — $28,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENOUNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCES — $28,500 · OtherUNIV OF NV RENO COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY & NATURAL RESOURCESUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY — $15,750 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF IDAHO — $11,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IDAHOIndividual grant recipient — $7,000 · OtherWEST TEXAS A&M — $6,750 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY — $5,500 · OtherOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · Other+16 more — $34,956 · Other+16 moreCornell University — $3,500 · EducationTREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · Education
Other$143,206Education$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCornell University — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nevada Agricultural Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph