Skip to content

· Public charity

Nethope Inc

Nethope empowers committed nonprofit organizations to change the world through the power of technology.

$326k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$333kEnvironment$238kArts & Culture$114kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kScience & Tech$60kFood & Nutrition$21k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $258k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$28,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USHAHIDI INC$55,440
OXFAM$41,000
Individual grant recipient$36,000
DCA$30,000
CARE NEDERLAND$28,306
HOT$28,000
SOS INTERNATIONAL$28,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR$21,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
PLAN INTERNATIONAL$12,000
WORLDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$11,844
IMC$10,000
USHAHIDI YUMBE PROJECT$7,861
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $30k → 14%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC: $90k → 17%MERCY CORPS INC: $29k → 12%PATH: $19k → 9%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of Nethope Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Nethope Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 24% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
6
Health in Harmony

Health in Harmony's mission is to reverse tropical rainforest deforestation for planetary health.

Health
7
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
8
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
9
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
10
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
11
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
12
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USHAHIDI INC: $55,440 · OtherUSHAHIDI INCIndividual grant recipient: $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $35,100 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESDCA: $30,000 · OtherDCAWORLD VISION INTERNATIONAL: $30,000 · OtherWORLD VISION INTERNATIONALCARE NEDERLAND: $28,306 · OtherCARE NEDERLANDSOS INTERNATIONAL: $28,000 · OtherSOS INTERNATIONALHOT: $28,000 · OtherHOTTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYTROICARE: $24,300 · OtherTROICAREFOOD FOR THE POOR: $21,000 · Other+5 more: $53,705 · Other+5 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC: $120,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $41,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCWORLD VISION INC: $31,232 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $30,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPSMercy Corps: $29,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsPATH: $18,900 · InternationalPATHINTERNEWS NETWORK: $171,717 · Arts & CultureINTERNEWS NETWORK
Other$394,851International$270,132Arts & Culture$171,717

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNEWS NETWORK: $171,717 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $41,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $31,232 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $29,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATH: $18,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNEWS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nethope Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nethope Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nethope’s filings →

More from the funding graph