Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$790k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$790k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Dekalb County Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’19
0
’20
4
’21
3
’22
3
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$790kEducation$228kRecreation & Sports$7k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$790,033
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$790,033
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $7k → 16%LAKE ERIE COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC: $7k → 15%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $7k → 10%Prachi Aggarwal: $6k → 6%MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 7%JASMINE LOVE: $6k → 7%JONATHON SCHENING: $5k → 8%CHICAGO MEDICAL SCHOOL AT ROSALIND: $12k → 8%DEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $790k → 13%DEBORAH ROSE: $8k → 14%Angela Ray: $7k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $7k → 19%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%LAKE ERIE COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC: $5k → 15%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $7k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $6k → 10%Prachi Aggarwal: $5k → 6%MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 7%Jasmine Love: $4k → 7%CHICAGO MEDICAL SCHOOL AT ROSALIND: $8k → 8%MADELINE DWYER: $13k → 13%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 14%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 7%CHICAGO MEDICAL SCHOOL AT ROSALIND: $6k → 8%Seong (Jessica) Park: $7k → 13%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FEINBERG: $12k → 14%Ashley Mathews: $3k → 8%Bohae Rachel Lee: $8k → 13%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FEINBERG: $10k → 14%Lakhena Leang: $7k → 13%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FEINBERG: $5k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FEINBERG: $3k → 14%Madelaine Rose Schaufel: $7k → 14%Ali Kahn: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$143k · 8 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$143k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+40%

Still filing today

38%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
EducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    The George Washington University
    3× · 2021–2023 · $22k · revenue +30%
  • MU
    Midwestern University
    3× · 2021–2023 · $18k · revenue +11%
  • LE
    LAKE ERIE COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $12k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $790,033 · PhilanthropyDEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FEINBERG: $30,100 · OtherNORTHWESTERN UNIVE…CHICAGO MEDICAL SCHOOL AT ROSALIND: $25,750 · OtherCHICAGO MEDICAL SC…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $13,175 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISC…Individual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant r…Individual grant recipient: $10,850 · OtherIndividual grant r…Individual grant recipient: $10,450 · OtherIndividual grant r…Individual grant recipient: $8,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,200 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,900 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $6,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · Other+3 more: $10,800 · Other+3 moreThe George Washington University: $21,750 · EducationMidwestern University: $18,150 · EducationLAKE ERIE COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE: $12,300 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · EducationNorthwestern University: $6,800 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$790,033Other$171,025Education$56,700Recreation & Sports$6,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $790,033 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetThe George Washington University: $21,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMidwestern University: $18,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE ERIE COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE: $12,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $6,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds Midwestern University ↗
  • Who funds LAKE ERIE COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

More from the funding graph