Skip to content

Indiana · Private foundation

Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$790k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2024
5
Organizations funded FY2023
20%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Dekalb County Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’19
0
’20
4
’21
3
’22
3
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2024
$790,033
Largest grant, FY2024
$790,033
Organizations funded a year
5 to 8
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 20% of the organizations Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funded were first-time grantees, receiving 16% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
EducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20235$44k20%
FY20226$54k17%
FY20218$49k100%
FY20208$43k75%
FY20196$45kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$790kEducation$228kRecreation & Sports$7k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The George Washington University$21,75030%
Midwestern University$18,15030%
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine$12,30020%
Northwestern University$6,80010%
Johns Hopkins University$4,50010%

Plus 17 recipients with no EIN on record ($171k), not named here.

Compare Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx with peer funders

About Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

How much does Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx give?
Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx reported 1 grants totaling $790,033 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 8 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2023, its largest causes are Philanthropy (77%), Education (22%), Recreation & Sports (1%).
Who are Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2023: The George Washington University ($22k), Midwestern University ($18k), Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine ($12k).
Does Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx based?
Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx is based in IN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nesbitt Medical Student Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

More from the funding graph