Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nella Durinda Levenhagen Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$450k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Two Foundation$250,000
Lutheran Metropolitan Ministries$50,000
Cleveland Museum of Natural History$50,000
Life Act$50,000
Vocational Guidance Services$25,000
New Directions$25,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Two Foundation: $250k → 17%Life Act: $50k → 17%Lutheran Metropolitan Ministries: $50k → 17%Vocational Guidance Services: $25k → 17%New Directions: $25k → 17%Cleveland Museum of Natural History: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

—
2
Minds Matter of Cleveland Ohio Inc

Minds matter of cleveland helps high school students from low income families prepare for and gain admission to four year college and universities by providing classes and act prep.

—
3
Cleveland Leadership Center

The mission of cleveland leadership center (the organization) is to build a continuum of civic leaders committed to our community's excellence by serving as a catalyst for civic engagement. the organization achieves its mission by…

Education
4
New Directions Career Center

New directions career center's mission is to uplift and empower women to achieve and maintain self-sufficiency by providing career counseling, employment-related education and information services. the center accomplishes its mission by…

Human Services
5
Vocational Services Inc

Providing job opportunities for individuals with barriers to employment

—
6
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative

Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.

Education
7
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
8
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
9
Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
10
Vgs Inc

Providing work experience and employment for persons with significant disabilities through government contract work.

Human Services
11
Maumee Valley Guidance Center Inc

To provide behavioral healthcare services for the continual enhancement of the quality of life across the life span, emphasizing treatment, community involvement, and innovative programs.

Health
12
Teenworks Inc

To empower teens to achieve excellence in college, career, and community.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Magnolia Clubhouse Inc; the most unlike its peers is Open Doors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE: $250,000 · EmploymentTWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUEVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $25,000 · EmploymentVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICESLutheran Metropolitan Ministries: $50,000 · OtherLutheran Metropoli…NEW DIRECTIONS INC: $25,000 · OtherNEW DIRECTIONS INCCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MU…LIFEACT: $50,000 · HealthLIFEACT
Employment$275,000Other$75,000Arts & Culture$50,000Health$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTWO FOUNDATION INC TWO CAFE & BOUTIQUE: $250,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEACT: $50,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sullivan Family FundFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sullivan Family Fund · The Cleveland Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nella Durinda Levenhagen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nella Durinda Levenhagen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nella Durinda Levenhagen Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Nella Durinda Levenhagen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nella Durinda Levenhagen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph