Skip to content
Negotiation and Team Resources at a glance

· Public charity

Negotiation and Team Resources

Providing teaching materials in areas of negotiation, dispute resolution and teamwork.

$143k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$181kSocial Science$38kHealth$30kCrime & Legal$20kEmployment$20kScience & Tech$20kCivil Rights$10kEnvironment$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $115,032, the rows itemized in this filing. The $143,098 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,066 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $106k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$301k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SANTA BARBARA$21,061
STANDFORD UNIVERSITY$14,945
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY OWEN GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT$10,026
WEBSTER UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO$10,000
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
VANDERBILT$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$10,000
IACM$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%WHARTON SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 22%STANDFORD UNIVERSITY: $15k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SANTA BARBARA: $21k → 14%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO: $10k → 13%INTERNATIONAL ASSOC FOR CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%WEBSTER UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY OWEN GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $10k → 14%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $9k → 8%IACM: $10k → 14%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 6%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $8k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $9k → 22%UC BERKELEY: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO: $10k → 13%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $7k → 11%BOOTH UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
SC
LA

Grants abroad, by region: $47k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$40k · 85% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: BEYOND RATIONAL CHOICE: HOW · CREATIVE IMPASSE RESOLUTION PROCESSES IN COMPLES NEGOTIATIONS · UNDER WHICH CONDITIONS ARE MANAGERS MORE (VS LESS) LIKELY TO DELEGATE NEGOTIATION AUTHORITY TO AN AI AGENT?

North America (Canada and Mexico)$7k · 15% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF AI AGENTS IN NEGOTIATION TRAINING: EFFICIENCY, ENGAGEMENT, AND OUTCOMES

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
4
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
10
Chancellor Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford

The principal objects of the University are the advancement of learning by teaching and research, and its dissemination by every means. We work as one Oxford bringing together our staff, students and alumni, our colleges, faculties,…

—
11
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carnegie Mellon University; the most unlike its peers is International Association for Conflict Management Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY AT BUFFALOUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $21,061 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARAUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEYMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYVANDERBILT UNIVERSITY OWEN GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $10,026 · OtherUniversity of Michigan: $10,000 · OtherLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherWHARTON SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 · OtherVANDERBILT: $10,000 · OtherGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherMORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherCarnegie Mellon University: $10,000 · OtherIACM: $10,000 · OtherUC BERKELEY: $10,000 · OtherBOOTH UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $10,000 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $9,420 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $8,960 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $8,382 · OtherVanderbilt University: $50,000 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $14,945 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND S…Webster University: $10,000 · EducationWebster UniversityINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR CONFLICT MANAGEMENT NFP: $10,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR CONFLIC…University of Chicago: $10,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $9,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYL…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $7,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
Other$227,849Education$110,945

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVanderbilt University: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $14,945 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWebster University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR CONFLICT MANAGEMENT NFP: $10,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds Webster University ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR CONFLICT MANAGEMENT NFP ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Negotiation and Team Resources funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Negotiation and Team Resources. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Negotiation and Team Resources?

    Find your warmest path to Negotiation and Team Resources through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $114k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Negotiation and Team Resources’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home