Skip to content

· Private foundation

Needy but Not Greedy Nancy L Amato and Robert a Amato Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$166k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $120k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY PROMISE OF PORTER COUNTY$10,000
HART PANTRY$10,000
THE GARDEN HOUSE FOUNDATION$10,000
NWI NO CHILD HUNGRY INC$10,000
CLAIRE PARKER FOUNDATION$10,000
500 TURKEYS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
LIGHT THE WAY (BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCH)$10,000
MAKE A KID SMILE CORP$10,000
C A S T FOR KIDS$10,000
ATTABOY$10,000
RAISING MEN AND WOMEN LAWN CARE$10,000
ZURI'S CIRCLE$8,000
OUR GREATER GOOD$8,000
MPOWRD$8,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE GARDEN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%MAKS CORP: $10k → 9%THE GARDEN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ZURIS CIRCLE: $10k → 11%ZURI'S CIRCLE: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$241k · 13 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$241k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

46%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CLAIRE PARKER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue -37%
  • HP
    HART PANTRY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • 5T
    500 TURKEYS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k

Funded once

  • M
    MAKS
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • RM
    RAISING MEN LAWN CARE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • RR
    ROTHENBERG ROOFTOP GARDEN
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Drive Kids Inc

To Fight Childhood Hunger through engaging kids

Philanthropy
2
Pretty Passionate Hands Inc

Pretty Passionate Hands Inc. is a charitable organization dedicated to supporting teen parents and vulnerable youth through education, mentorship, and life-skills development. The organization provides parenting education, financial…

Community Improvement
3
Helping Hands 4 Kids

Our organization helps families and children with tangible support throughout the year. Our funds go directly to providing food, clothing, basic living needs, backpacks and other things they need to help them get through their day. Each…

Community Improvement
4
Hops Kids

Provide food for kids in the community that are hungry. build a food pantry at the local elementary school to provide food for students to take home.

—
5
Positive Direction for Youth and Families Inc

Our mission is to embrace, empower, and equip youth and families. Our goal is to Alleviate hunger and homelessness through a variety programming including an emergency food pantry, resource center, and community garden.

Religion
6
Tricity Pantry

Provide groceries to families struggling with Food Insecurity and other necessities such's as shoes backpacks school supplies at no cost. Providing access to all regardless or any circumstances

Food & Nutrition
7
Growing Roots

Strengthening communities through building and maintaining urban farms and gardens in Southern California.

Food & Nutrition
8
Kids Bring Life Inc

Our programs are geared to assist those children in low to moderate income families by providing free nutritious meals so they can can focus on their education which will later enable them to become adults that do not become victims of…

—
9
Zia Incorporated

Providing food security for Philadelphia schoolchildren and their families with a nutritious meal-kit based delivery model

Food & Nutrition
10
Back Pack for Kids

Provide food for school age children.

Philanthropy
11
People Help Exchange Inc

Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Kids with Kindness Inc

Do acts of kindness for the community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 500 Turkeys Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hart Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
1/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

C A S T FOR KIDS: $20,000 · OtherC A S T FOR KIDSFAMILY PROMISE OF PORTER COUNTY INC: $20,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF PORTER COUNTY INCIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE MAGIC YARN PROJECT: $18,000 · OtherTHE MAGIC YARN PROJECTAZ FAITH AND FAMILIES: $15,480 · OtherAZ FAITH AND FAMILIESIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIGHT THE WAY (BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCH): $10,000 · OtherLIGHT THE WAY (BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCH)RAISING MEN LAWN CARE INC: $10,000 · OtherRAISING MEN LAWN CARE INCMAKE A KID SMILE CORP: $10,000 · OtherMAKE A KID SMILE CORPNADABURG EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherNADABURG EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCRAISING MEN AND WOMEN LAWN CARE: $10,000 · OtherRAISING MEN AND WOMEN LAWN CARESTEPPING STONE SHELTER: $10,000 · OtherSTEPPING STONE SHELTERATTABOY: $10,000 · OtherATTABOY+2 more: $5,000 · OtherHART PANTRY: $20,000 · Food & NutritionHART PANTRY500 TURKEYS INC: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition500 TURKEYS INCNWI NO CHILD HUNGRY INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionNWI NO CHILD HUN…GARDEN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesGARDEN HOUSE FO…ZURI CIRCLE: $18,000 · Human ServicesZURI CIRCLEMAKS: $10,000 · Human ServicesMAKSTHE CLAIRE PARKER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthTHE CLAIRE P…TEEN ADDICTION ANONYMOUS: $18,000 · HealthTEEN ADDICTI…Our Greater Good Incorporated: $18,000 · Community ImprovementROTHENBERG ROOFTOP GARDEN: $10,000 · Education
Other$182,480Food & Nutrition$50,000Human Services$48,000Health$38,000Community Improvement$18,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CLAIRE PARKER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetHART PANTRY: $20,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budget500 TURKEYS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetGARDEN HOUSE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetZURI CIRCLE: $18,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetOur Greater Good Incorporated: $18,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetMAKS: $10,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetRAISING MEN LAWN CARE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetROTHENBERG ROOFTOP GARDEN: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CLAIRE PARKER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HART PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds 500 TURKEYS INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEEN ADDICTION ANONYMOUS ↗
  • Who funds ZURI CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds Our Greater Good Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds MAKS ↗
  • Who funds RAISING MEN LAWN CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROTHENBERG ROOFTOP GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds NWI NO CHILD HUNGRY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Robert & Nancy Amato Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Robert & Nancy Amato Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Needy but Not Greedy Nancy L Amato and Robert a Amato Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Needy but Not Greedy Nancy L Amato and Robert a Amato Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Needy but Not Greedy Nancy L Amato and Robert a Amato Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Needy but Not Greedy Nancy L Amato and Robert a Amato Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Needy but Not Greedy Nancy L Amato and Robert a Amato’s filings →

    More from the funding graph