Skip to content
Neat Repeats Resale Shop Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Neat Repeats Resale Shop Inc

Neat Repeats mission is to provide support to organizations, families, school scholarships, food shelves, etc.

$174k
Granted FY2026still arriving
2
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$94kFood & Nutrition$57kHealth$12kEducation$5kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2026 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $38,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $173,680 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $135,680 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACCAG$30,000
MREMS$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–26, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ACCAG: $31k → 9%ACCAG: $30k → 9%ACCAG: $29k → 9%ACCAG: $25k → 9%Tri-Valley Transit: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$160k · 3 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$160k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+33%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ADDISON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION GRO INC D/B/A HOPE
    4× · 2023–2026 · $115k · revenue +20%
  • ES
    Elderly Services Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $26k · revenue +127%
  • MV
    Middlebury Volunteer Ambulance Association Inc
    2× · 2023–2026 · $20k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • AC
    Addison County Community Action
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • TT
    TRI-VALLEY TRANSIT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • HA
    HAVE A HEART FOOD SHELF
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADDISON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION GRO INC D/B/A HOPE: $114,500 · Human ServicesADDISON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION GRO INC D/B/A HOPETRI-VALLEY TRANSIT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTRI-VALLEY TRANSIT INCElderly Services Inc: $25,700 · OtherElderly Services IncAddison County Community Action: $20,400 · OtherAddison County Community Actio…HAVE A HEART FOOD SHELF: $6,000 · OtherHAVE A HEART FOOD SHELFColumbus Smith Trust Estate: $5,000 · OtherColumbus Smith Trust EstateMiddlebury Volunteer Ambulance Association Inc: $20,000 · HealthMiddlebury…Red Clover Childrens Center Inc: $5,154 · EducationFriends of the Vergennes Opera House Inc: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$124,500Other$57,100Health$20,000Education$5,154Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADDISON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION GRO INC D/B/A HOPE: $114,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetElderly Services Inc: $25,700 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMiddlebury Volunteer Ambulance Association Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTRI-VALLEY TRANSIT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRed Clover Childrens Center Inc: $5,154 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetFriends of the Vergennes Opera House Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Addison…The Vermont Community…
United Way of Addison County IncVT15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Addison County Inc · The Vermont Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neat Repeats Resale Shop Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neat Repeats Resale Shop Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 34%
  • Friends of the Vergennes Opera House Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Tri-Valley Transit Inc: 81% of income from government
  • Red Clover Childrens Center Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Elderly Services Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Addison County Community Action Gro Inc D/B/a Hope: 18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Neat Repeats Resale Shop Inc?

Find your warmest path to Neat Repeats Resale Shop Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Neat Repeats Resale Shop’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home