· Private foundation
Ncw Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROOM TO GROW | $2,500 |
| RYE POLICE ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| WATCH HILL LIGHTHOUSE KEEPERS | $750 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100 |
| RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC7× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +11%
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY4× · 2017–2023 · $31k · revenue +47%
Northwestern University3× · 2019–2022 · $4k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- FPFORDHAM PREPARATORY SCHOOLone grant, 2024 · $15k
- AIAccelerate Instituteone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -33%
- RYRYE YOUTH ATHLETIC FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The program was formed to foster, promote, encourage and support the playing of soccer in the city of rye, new york.
To conserve and steward long island's natural and historic lands, waters and environmental resources. through education, outreach and volunteerism, we connect people to nature and inspire a community conservation ethic.
The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…
Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…
Protects and restores the hudson river from source to sea and safeguards drinking water supplies.
See schedule onylcvef's mission is to educate, engage and empower new yorkers to be effective advocates on behalf of the environment from clean energy and funding for parks, to solid waste and green buildings. first, we educate new yorkers…
The baykeeper's mission is to protect, preserve, and restore the ecological integrity and productivity of the hudson-raritan estuary - one of the most urban estuaries on the planet. since 1989, the organization has served as a citizen…
The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…
To educate the community as to the significance of their architectural and historic heritage through the preservation, protection, improvement, and restoration of sites and buildings in western new york that are of historic or civic…
Conservation of lyme's natural, scenic and historic land & water resources.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Westerly Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is Alford Land Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds UP2US INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Accelerate Institute ↗
- Who funds RYE YOUTH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE WESTERLY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds POLICE ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF RYE INC ↗
- Who funds ARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING ↗
- Who funds LIGHTNING BASKETBALL INC ↗
- Who funds ST LUKE'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds SOUL RYEDERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE WATCH HILL CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds EMMA'S TORCH LTD ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF RYE TOWN PARK INC ↗
- Who funds THE RYE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF RYE NATURE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOUNDWATERS INC ↗
- Who funds RYE YOUTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds THE JAY HERITAGE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Chess Foundation · The Joe & Sandy Samberg Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Mile 20 Foundation Inc · John and Jennifer Eckerson Family Foundation C/O Citrin Cooperman · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Hamilton Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Nicholas & Christina Raho Foundationinc · Soros Fund Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ncw Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Soundwaters Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.