Skip to content

· Public charity

Ncasi Foundation

The NCASI FOUNDATION supports environmental science and data to promote the sustainable use of earth's resources, inform regulatory policy, educate, and execute the charitable activities of ncasi, inc.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$866k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$4.2MAnimals$1.2MScience & Tech$278kEducation$215kPhilanthropy$55kSocial Science$21k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $779k
  • $250k+1 grant · $866k
$65,418
Median grant
13
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC$865,862
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AMINISTRATION UNIVERSITY OF MAINE$203,638
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS$87,729
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$85,083
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$79,197
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION$76,970
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY$72,326
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$65,418
MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY$54,608
SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY$53,689
TANGLED BANK CONSERVATION$49,500
AMERICAN CONSERVATION EXPERIENCE$22,149
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO$20,541
SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS$13,269
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$10,612
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN CONSERVATION EXPERIENCE: $22k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $88k → 12%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $21k → 16%SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS: $15k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $154k → 16%CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE: $57k → 18%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC: $866k → 8%TANGLED BANK CONSERVATION: $160k → 12%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $77k → 19%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $55k → 24%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY: $72k → 21%SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY: $54k → 14%LOUISIANA WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES: $81k → 19%THE PRESIDENT & TRUSTEES OF COLBY COLLEGE: $20k → 12%OFFICE OF RESEARCH AMINISTRATION UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $204k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $6k → 12%SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS: $13k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $65k → 16%CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE: $32k → 18%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC: $842k → 8%TANGLED BANK CONSERVATION: $119k → 12%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $15k → 19%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY: $32k → 21%LOUISIANA WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES: $27k → 19%OFFICE OF RESEARCH AMINISTRATION UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $94k → 15%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $52k → 16%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $79k → 18%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC: $772k → 8%TANGLED BANK CONSERVATION: $50k → 12%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $6k → 19%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $19k → 16%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $27k → 18%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC: $765k → 8%TANGLED BANK CONSERVATION: $50k → 12%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $23k → 18%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC: $409k → 8%TANGLED BANK CONSERVATION: $40k → 12%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC: $281k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
ID
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
OH
WV
VA
AZ
NC
DC
LA
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 65% of Ncasi Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 73% of the giving stays in NC; by stated purpose, 7%.

Ncasi Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 14 repeat orgs$246k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$5.8M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-7%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $151k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3.9M · revenue +12%
  • LW
    LOUISIANA WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $108k · revenue +16%
  • Cornell University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • UE
    US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    one grant, 2021 · $75k
  • The President and Trustees of Colby College
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
4
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
5
The Center for Conservation Biology

Mission statement: our mission is to provide the global community with the information needed to drive thoughtful, science-based conservation, to educate and train the next generation of conservation scientists, and to make lasting…

Environment
6
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
7
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
8
Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities

Aplu is a membership organization that fosters a community of university leaders collectively working to advance the mission of public research universities. the association's membership consists of more than 250 public research…

Education
9
Ncasi Foundation

The ncasi foundation supports environmental science and data to promote the sustainable use of earth's resources, inform regulatory policy, educate, and execute the charitable activities of ncasi, inc.

Animals
10
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
Discover Life in America Inc

Dlia will develop a model for research in biodiversity and will use the knowledge to develop and disseminate information to encourage the discovery, understanding, preservation, and enjoyment of natural resources.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society of American Foresters; the most unlike its peers is National Council for Air and Stream Improvement Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC: $3,934,499 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INCTANGLED BANK CONSERVATION: $418,239 · OtherTANGLED BANK CONSERVATIONUNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM INC: $297,544 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM INCMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $289,627 · Other+9 more: $609,713 · Other+9 moreLOUISIANA WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES FOUNDATION: $108,069 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE: $89,327 · EnvironmentAmerican Conservation Experience: $22,149 · EnvironmentCornell University: $100,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $97,569 · EducationThe President and Trustees of Colby College: $20,000 · EducationSOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS: $28,394 · Employment
Other$5,549,622Environment$219,545Education$217,569Employment$28,394

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC: $3,934,499 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetLOUISIANA WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES FOUNDATION: $108,069 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetCornell University: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $97,569 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE: $89,327 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS: $28,394 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS ↗
  • Who funds American Conservation Experience ↗
  • Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Fish and Wildlife FoundationDC19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ncasi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ncasi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Conservation Biology Institute: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ncasi Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ncasi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ncasi’s filings →

More from the funding graph