Skip to content

· Private foundation

NC CO Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0155% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$49kReligion$49kScience & Tech$2kHealth$2kPhilanthropy$694Food & Nutrition$280Education$200International$90Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$17,886
Median grant
1
States reached
$220k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Miscellaneous Charities Less Than 1500$17,886
Individual grant recipient$2,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $899) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Oorah: $125 → 11%Kimpatorin Aid: $36 → 20%Chayim Aruchim: $18 → 20%A Time: $180 → 20%Bonei Olam: $360 → 20%Bonei Olam: $180 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$66k · 14 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +288% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
72

Total granted

$66k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+288%
+13%

Still filing today

21%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $540 · revenue +77%
  • SO
    SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247
    2× · 2018–2020 · $126 · revenue +288%
  • FI
    FEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2020 · $36 · revenue +797%

Funded once

  • BM
    Bais Medrash Ohr Chaim
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • SZ
    SMACH ZEVILIN OF NY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +26%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
2
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
3
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
4
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
5
Shaare Mordechai Inc

The organization's primary mission is charitable and religious in nature, supporting judaic and rabbinical education by providing financial assistance to institutions of jewish learning, currently through grants to shaare mordechai in…

Religion
6
Chevra-Kadisha Yerushalayim Inc

To facilitate traditional religious burial for those of the orthodox jewish faith in accordance with the ancient jewish custom of being buried on israeli soil by arranging for the resale of burial plots in israeli cemeteries and providing…

Philanthropy
7
Keren Hayeshivot Fund Inc

Keren hayeshivot fund supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.

Philanthropy
8
Keren Hayeshivot Trust

Keren hayeshivot trust supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.

Philanthropy
9
Nezer Yisroel Inc
—
10
Friends of Nahar Shalom Inc

To provide assistance to yeshivat nahar shalom, an educational institution located in israel.

Religion
11
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
12
Kolel Zichron Avrohom Inc

Supervision of kosher meal preparation

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Reb Shayalas Kitchen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Miscellaneous Charities Less Than 1500: $29,717 · OtherMiscellaneous Charities Less Than 1500Bais Medrash Ohr Chaim: $25,000 · OtherBais Medrash Ohr ChaimBeth Medrash Ohr Chaim Inc: $18,605 · OtherBeth Medrash Ohr Chaim IncIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $8,625 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $4,408 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,200 · Other+64 more: $17,551 · Other+64 moreSMACH ZEVILIN OF NY INC: $19,500 · PhilanthropySMACH ZEVILIN O…+3 more: $106 · PhilanthropyYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $1,218 · Education+1 more: $18 · EducationBonei Olam Inc: $540 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $180 · Human ServicesOORAH INC: $125 · Human ServicesKIMPATORIN AID INC: $36 · Human Services+1 more: $18 · Human ServicesReb Shayalas Kitchen: $180 · Food & NutritionSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $126 · Food & NutritionMASBIA: $100 · Food & NutritionKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $180 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $54 · Religion
Other$118,106Philanthropy$19,606Education$1,236Human Services$899Food & Nutrition$406Religion$234

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSMACH ZEVILIN OF NY INC: $19,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $1,218 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF NEVE COLLEGE FOR WOMEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetReb Shayalas Kitchen: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $126 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOORAH INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASBIA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNER ECHAD INC: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $36 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIMPATORIN AID INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATSKILLS HATZALAH INC: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAYIM ARUCHIM INC: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SMACH ZEVILIN OF NY INC ↗
  • Who funds Yeshiva Tiferes Yisroel ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NEVE COLLEGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
  • Who funds Reb Shayalas Kitchen ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HASHVIIS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗
  • Who funds OORAH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY26× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Yisroel Aryeh and Leib Foundation · Jsw Foundation · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Mkz Charity Foundation Inc · Md Friedman Family Foundation · Kitov Foundation · Zichron Simcha Dsassov

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization NC CO Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from NC CO Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oorah Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on NC’s filings →

More from the funding graph