Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nbh Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$180kArts & Culture$40kPhilanthropy$35kHuman Services$33kEnvironment$28kHealth$21kAnimals$15k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY INC$20,000
WILLIAMS COLLEGE - ALUMNI FUND$20,000
THE NAPLES PLAYERS - COMMUNITY THEATRE$20,000
CHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING$15,000
GUADALUPE CENTER$10,000
WOMEN'S EMERGENCY NETWORK INC$7,000
COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
AUDUBON CORKSCREW SWAMP SANCTUARY$5,000
CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER$3,000
AUDUBON WESTERN EVERGLADES$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $5k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $8k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY INC: $25k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY INC: $24k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY INC: $20k → 10%FUN TIME EARLY CHILDHOOD ACADEMY INC: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$276k · 8 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$276k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+8%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $84k · revenue +210%
  • GC
    Guadalupe Center Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $28k · revenue +10%
  • WE
    WOMENS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $21k · revenue +231%

Funded once

  • LW
    LORENZO WALKER TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • NH
    NAPLES HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Wildlife Corridor Foundation Inc

To champion a collaborative campaign to permanently connect, protect and restore the Florida Wildlife Corridor, a statewide network of lands and waters that supports wildlife and people. We combine conservation science with compelling…

Environment
2
Early Learning Coalition of Palm Beach County Inc

To manage, improve and evaluate an integrated and quality seamless service delivery system for all publicly-funded early care and education programs serving children from birth to five years of age and school-age siblings to serve families…

Education
3
Healthy Woman Women's Clinics of Florida Inc

Provide low cost or free medical services for women

Health
4
Florida Council of Independent Schools

Accrediting independent schools.

—
5
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
6
Florida Coalition for Children Foundation Inc

To provide educational materials, training and information technology to agencies who work on behalf of florida's abused and neglected children and function as a service agency for the membership.

Human Services
7
Florida Alliance of Children's Councils & Trusts Inc

To promote policies that build effective primary prevention and early intervention systems of support for florida's children and families by engaging and enhancing the collective strengths of the individual children's services councils of…

—
8
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
9
Community First Credit Union of Florida

Community first credit union of florida's mission is to provide the highest in quality financial solutions for every stage of life.

—
10
Collaborative for Children

The mission of Collaborative for Children is to meaningfully improve the quality of early childhood education and care for Greater Houston's children through those most influential in their lives.

Human Services
11
Suncoast Waterkeeper Inc

We unite the suncoast to protect and improve our waters through science-driven actions.

—
12
Florida College Inc

Florida college, as a private, independent liberal arts college, provides a comprehensive undergraduate experience designed to develop students spiritually, mentally, physically, and socially; to integrate into the students' lives the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Guadalupe Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING: $60,000 · OtherCHAMPIONS FOR LEARNINGTHE NAPLES PLAYERS - COMMUNITY THEATRE: $40,000 · OtherTHE NAPLES PLAYERS - COMMUNITY THEATRECOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · OtherCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCWOMENS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC: $21,000 · OtherWOMENS EMERGENCY NETWORK INCAUDUBON CORKSCREW SWAMP SANCTUARY: $15,000 · OtherAUDUBON CORKSCREW SWAMP SANCTUARYLORENZO WALKER TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10,000 · OtherLORENZO WALKER TECHNICAL COLLEGE+1 more: $6,000 · OtherFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc: $84,000 · Human ServicesFun Time Early Childhood Academy IncGuadalupe Center Inc: $28,000 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Center IncTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC: $19,000 · EnvironmentCAPTAINS …Collier County Audubon Society Inc Audubon Western Everglades: $9,000 · EnvironmentCollier C…Williams College: $20,000 · Education
Other$187,000Human Services$117,000Environment$28,000Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc: $84,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC: $21,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetWilliams College: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCollier County Audubon Society Inc Audubon Western Everglades: $9,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nbh Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nbh Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nbh Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nbh Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nbh Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph