Skip to content

· Private foundation

Naught Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Youth Development$50kInternational$21kEducation$11kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$8kCommunity Improvement$7kFood & Nutrition$4kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EYES OPEN INTERNATIONAL$8,220
WHOLE AGAIN$5,000
THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES$3,500
BALDRIGE FOUNDATION$2,000
SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES$2,000
BRIGHT STAR COMMUNITY CHURCH$1,500
COMMUNITIES OF EXCELLENCE 2026$1,000
THE PARTNERSHIP FOR EXCELLENCE$1,000
EASLEY BLESSED FOUNDATION$500
MOVEMBER FOUNDATION$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4k → 16%SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 16%SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 16%EYES OPEN INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 16%EYES OPEN INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 16%EYES OPEN INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 16%EYES OPEN INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 16%EYES OPEN INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OH
CA
KS
DC
HI
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$109k · 10 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$109k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
0%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EO
    EYES OPEN INTERNATIONAL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $20k · revenue +282% · 26% of their budget
  • TF
    THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +11%
  • AH
    ALOHA HARVEST
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • UU
    UNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • M2
    Matthew 25 Ministries Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue -6%
  • TC
    THE CURE STARTS NOW INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
Medtech Innovator

Medtech innovator organizes and runs a global competition and virtual accelerator for medical device, digital health, and diagnostic startup companies.

Education
7
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
10
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
11
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
12
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Eyes Open International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
5/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WHOLE AGAIN: $49,816 · Youth DevelopmentWHOLE AGAINEYES OPEN INTERNATIONAL: $19,720 · Human ServicesEYES OPEN INTERNATIONALSANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesSANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVI…THE FOUNDATION FOR THE MALCOLM BALDRIGE NATIONAL QUALITY AWARD INC: $9,500 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE MA…COMMUNITIES OF EXCELLENCE 2026: $6,750 · OtherCOMMUNITIES OF EXCELLENCE…THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $5,750 · OtherTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STU…BRIGHT STAR COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $1,500 · OtherBRIGHT STAR COMMUNITY CHU…Individual grant recipient: $1,000 · Other+2 more: $1,000 · OtherTHE PARTNERSHIP FOR EXCELLENCE: $5,000 · EducationALOHA HARVEST: $3,000 · Food & NutritionMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $750 · HealthTHE CURE STARTS NOW INC: $500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $250 · HealthTHE SOUTHEAST ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $250 · HealthUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $1,000 · InternationalMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $500 · International
Youth Development$49,816Human Services$27,220Other$25,500Education$5,000Food & Nutrition$3,000Health$2,000International$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHOLE AGAIN: $49,816 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetEYES OPEN INTERNATIONAL: $19,720 over 5y, 26% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE MALCOLM BALDRIGE NATIONAL QUALITY AWARD INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $5,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARTNERSHIP FOR EXCELLENCE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetALOHA HARVEST: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CURE STARTS NOW INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHEAST ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Naught Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Naught Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Naught Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Naught Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Naught’s filings →

    More from the funding graph