Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Natl Alliance of Community & Economic Developmen

To lead the community partners in shaping and influencing strategies that advance community prosperity we advocate for reliable resources and systems that benefit low and moderate income communities and we build the capacity of members and practitioners working in these areas.

$15k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$15,000
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$732k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development$28,70021%
National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders$12,00010%
Network for Developing Conscious Communities Inc$8,5001n/a

Compare Natl Alliance of Community & Economic Developmen with peer funders

About Natl Alliance of Community & Economic Developmen

How much does Natl Alliance of Community & Economic Developmen give?
Natl Alliance of Community & Economic Developmen reported 1 grants totaling $15,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Natl Alliance of Community & Economic Developmen fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Community Improvement (100%).
Who are Natl Alliance of Community & Economic Developmen's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development ($29k), National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders ($12k), Network for Developing Conscious Communities Inc ($9k).
Where is Natl Alliance of Community & Economic Developmen based?
Natl Alliance of Community & Economic Developmen is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Natl Alliance of Community & Economic Developmen’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home