· Public charity
Native Arts and Cultures Foundation Inc
Native arts and cultures foundation advances equity and cultural knowledge, focusing on the power of arts and collaboration to strengthen native communities and promote positive social change with american indian, native hawaiian, and alaska native peoples in the us.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $287,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $502,300 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $215,300 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $120k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NINTH ISLAND DOCUMENTARY LLC | $50,000 |
| NEW EXPRESSIVE WORKS | $50,000 |
| NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL | $50,000 |
| KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES | $25,000 |
| TAKSHANUK WATERSHED COUNCIL | $25,000 |
| FORGE PROJECT ASSOCIATION | $25,000 |
| EPHEMERA LLC | $25,000 |
| TE AO MANA INC | $20,000 |
| THE CHINATI FOUNDATION | $9,500 |
| SOUTHWESTERN ASSOCIATION FOR INDIAN ARTS | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RSROSY SIMAS DANSE INC2× · 2021–2023 · $110k · revenue +58% · 37% of their budget
- HTHONOLULU THEATRE FOR YOUTH2× · 2021–2023 · $110k · revenue +33%
NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- PLPOSTCOMMODITY LLCone grant, 2021 · $100k
- PIPACIFIC ISLANDERS IN COMMUNICATIONSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +43%
- YOYOUNG OF HEART WORKSHOPgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $84k · revenue +345% · 46% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Kala Art Institute's mission is to help artists sustain their creative work over time through its Artist-in-Residence and Fellowship Programs, and to engage the community through exhibitions, public programs and education.
To enliven and expand the understanding of craft and the museum experience for all.
To support Native artists, cultural bearers, and other groups who build and care for Hawaii places that promote Aina.
Our mission is to help improve Indigenous well-being through art-making community building and equitable creative opportunities for personal and professional growth.
Preserve, perpetuate, and educate the public in matters relating to the native hawaiian culture and arts now and for future generations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pacific Islanders in Communications and the most unlike its peers is Kealakai Center for Pacific String Traditions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROSY SIMAS DANSE INC ↗
- Who funds HONOLULU THEATRE FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds NEW EXPRESSIVE WORKS ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN COMMUNICATIONS ↗
- Who funds YOUNG OF HEART WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE TIME INC ↗
- Who funds Old Harbor Alliance ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Kealakai Center For Pacific String Traditions ↗
- Who funds THE GARDEN ISLAND ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds TAKSHANUK WATERSHED COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds GRAND CANYON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GOLDBELT HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HONOLULU BIENNIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Native Peoples Action Community Fund ↗
- Who funds The New School ↗
- Who funds FORGE PROJECT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds WPKN Incorporated ↗
- Who funds TE AO MANA INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA RIVER INSTITUTE FOR INDIGENOUS ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN ASSOCIATION FOR INDIAN INDIAN ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE CHINATI FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement · Rasmuson Foundation · Native American Agriculture Fund · Cooke Foundation Limited · The Map Fund Inc · Seeding Justice · New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated · The Alaska Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Native Arts and Cultures Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New Expressive Works — 5% of income from government
- Wpkn Incorporated — 2% of income from government
- Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.