Skip to content

· Public charity

National Rifle Association of America

Per nra bylaws, to protect and defend the u.s.

$298k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$202kAnimals$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$63kRecreation & Sports$46kPublic Benefit$38kCivil Rights$8k
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,440
Median grant
14
States reached
$137M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI$50,000
CITY OF ALTON - ALTON POLICE DEPARTMENT$25,000
STATE OF ALABAMA$25,000
SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF GAME FISH & PARKS$25,000
CITY OF HUNTINGBURG - HUNTINGBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT$25,000
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION$25,000
TOWN OF HUDSON NH OFFICE OF SELECTMEN$15,750
LASSEN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$15,440
TRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$15,439
MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$15,415
MURRAY STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$15,300
CITY OF VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT$12,500
WEAKLEY COUNTY GOVERNMENT$11,750
CITY OF EATON$10,000
KEYSTONE RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%VALLEY COUNTY GUN CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 8%KEYSTONE RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION: $6k → 12%LASSEN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 17%CITY OF VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $13k → 17%OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION: $25k → 16%MURRAY STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 21%National Fdn for Women Legislators: $15k → 14%IOWA FIREARMS COALITION: $8k → 13%STATE OF ALABAMA: $25k → 18%STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI: $50k → 8%WEAKLEY COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $12k → 18%MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 16%TRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 18%CITY OF HUNTINGBURG - HUNTINGBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT: $25k → 8%CITY OF EATON: $10k → 11%CITY OF ALTON - ALTON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $25k → 12%SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF GAME FISH & PARKS: $25k → 10%TOWN OF HUDSON NH OFFICE OF SELECTMEN: $16k → 7%LASSEN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 17%OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION: $25k → 16%MURRAY STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $9k → 21%NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN LEGISLATORS: $13k → 14%MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 16%TRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 18%SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF GAME FISH & PARKS: $25k → 10%National Foundation For Women Legislators: $12k → 14%National Foundation For Women Legislators: $6k → 14%National Foundation For Women Legislators: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
IL
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$252k · 7 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$252k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
-12%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $181k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
EducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN LEGISLATORS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $52k · revenue +61%
  • LC
    LASSEN COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +948%
  • TS
    TRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • VC
    VALLEY COUNTY GUN CLUB FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • IF
    IOWA FIREARMS COALITION
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN LEGISLATORS INC: $52,328 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN LEGISLATORS INCSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMASTATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI: $50,000 · OtherSTATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURILASSEN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,138 · OtherLASSEN COLLEGE FOUNDATIONMONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,015 · OtherMONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCCITY OF ALTON PARKS AND RECREATION: $25,000 · OtherCITY OF ALTON PARKS AND RECREATIONAlabama Dept Conservation & Natural Res: $25,000 · OtherAlabama Dept Conservation & Natural ResCITY OF HUNTINGBURG: $25,000 · OtherCITY OF HUNTINGBURGTOWN OF HUDSON NH OFFICE OF SELECTMEN: $15,750 · OtherVALLEY COUNTY GUN CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $40,250 · Other+4 moreTRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,137 · EducationTRINIDAD STA…MURRAY STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $24,600 · EducationMURRAY STATE…IOWA FIREARMS COALITION: $7,500 · Civil Rights
Other$398,481Education$49,737Civil Rights$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN LEGISLATORS INC: $52,328 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetLASSEN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,138 over 2y, 21% of budgetTRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,137 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,015 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMURRAY STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $24,600 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetIOWA FIREARMS COALITION: $7,500 over 1y, 7.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN LEGISLATORS INC ↗
  • Who funds LASSEN COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MURRAY STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IOWA FIREARMS COALITION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Brownell Family FoundationIA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Brownell Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Rifle Association of America funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Rifle Association of America. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Rifle Association of America’s filings →

    More from the funding graph