Skip to content

Colorado · Public charity

National Leiomyosarcoma Foundation Inc

A nbsp;quest nbsp;for nbsp;the nbsp;cure nbsp;of nbsp;lms nbsp;disease

$161k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2024
4
Organizations funded FY2023
75%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 4
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$453k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 75% of the organizations National Leiomyosarcoma Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 96% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
HealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving4$160k50%
FY20234$235k75%
FY20222$107k100%
FY20212$75k0%
FY20203$111k67%
FY20192$88k50%
FY20182$55kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$781kScience & Tech$110k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
OH
CA
MD
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Sarc$197,91762%
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc$100,00010%
The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre$100,00010%
Cancer Research Institute Inc$100,00010%
The Johns Hopkins Hospital$100,00020%
Regents of the University of Michigan$75,0002n/a
Frederic Amant$50,0001n/a
Brigham and Women's Hospital Inc$50,0001n/a
H Lee Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute Foundation$25,0001n/a
Md Anderson Cancer Center$25,0001n/a
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of National Leiomyosarcoma Foundation Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Sarc$197,91762%
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc$100,00010%
The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre$100,00010%
Cancer Research Institute Inc$100,00010%
The Johns Hopkins Hospital$100,00020%
Regents of the University of Michigan$75,0002n/a
Frederic Amant$50,0001n/a
Brigham and Women's Hospital Inc$50,0001n/a
H Lee Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute Foundation$25,0001n/a
Md Anderson Cancer Center$25,0001n/a
Tumor and Cell Line Rna Sequencing$7,2721n/a
James Cancer Center at OSU$1,0001n/a

Compare National Leiomyosarcoma Foundation Inc with peer funders

About National Leiomyosarcoma Foundation Inc

How much does National Leiomyosarcoma Foundation Inc give?
National Leiomyosarcoma Foundation Inc reported 4 grants totaling $161,400 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 4 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does National Leiomyosarcoma Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (88%), Science & Tech (12%).
Who are National Leiomyosarcoma Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Sarc ($198k), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ($100k), The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre ($100k).
Does National Leiomyosarcoma Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 75% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is National Leiomyosarcoma Foundation Inc based?
National Leiomyosarcoma Foundation Inc is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Leiomyosarcoma’s filings →

More from the funding graph