Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

National Institute for Pharmaceutical Technology and Education Inc

The National Institute for Pharmaceutical Technology and Education (NIPTE) is a premier consortium of top universities working to advance pharmaceutical science, technology, and manufacturing.

$3.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$892k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 83% of National Institute for Pharmaceutical Technology and Education Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $2,929,239 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,089,367 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $160,128 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $641k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.3M
$234,683
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Virginia Commonwealth University$891,756
Rutgers University$797,822
University of Minnesota$299,273
Massachusetts Institute of Technology$299,124
University of Puerto Rico$234,683
Purdue University$167,778
Northeastern University$99,271
University of Iowa$77,349
Duquesne University$62,183
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $299k → 8%Northeastern University: $99k → 16%University of Minnesota: $371k → 11%Duquesne University: $251k → 11%Long Island University: $211k → 20%University of Texas at Austin: $91k → 10%Texas A and M University: $359k → 27%University of Iowa: $240k → 15%University of Michigan: $181k → 14%University of Connecticut: $136k → 11%Indiana University: $20k → 18%Purdue University: $561k → 19%Ohio State University: $42k → 15%Rutgers University: $1.2M → 8%Virginia Commonwealth University: $892k → 22%United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP): $165k → 8%University of Maryland: $921k → 11%University of Maryland: $211k → 19%University of Kentucky: $248k → 15%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $298k → 8%Northeastern University: $86k → 16%University of Minnesota: $299k → 11%Duquesne University: $217k → 11%Texas A and M University: $112k → 27%University of Iowa: $141k → 15%University of Michigan: $115k → 14%Purdue University: $168k → 19%Rutgers University: $798k → 8%Virginia Commonwealth University: $581k → 22%United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP): $83k → 8%University of Maryland: $123k → 19%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $38k → 8%University of Minnesota: $235k → 11%Duquesne University: $62k → 11%University of Iowa: $77k → 15%Purdue University: $144k → 19%Rutgers University: $106k → 8%Virginia Commonwealth University: $47k → 22%University of Minnesota: $119k → 11%Duquesne University: $33k → 11%University of Iowa: $77k → 15%Purdue University: $111k → 19%Rutgers University: $18k → 8%Virginia Commonwealth University: $19k → 22%University of Minnesota: $47k → 11%Purdue University: $77k → 19%University of Minnesota: $35k → 11%Purdue University: $77k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
KY
VA
MD
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 14 repeat orgs$537k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$10M
$537k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+45%

Still filing today

21%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
    4× · 2018–2025 · $563k · revenue +24%
  • US
    UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $248k · revenue +5%
  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $185k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Kentucky Research Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $248k · revenue +57%
  • LI
    LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $211k · revenue +5%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $42k · revenue +45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,092,168 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITYVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS — $1,539,052 · OtherVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUSUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK — $1,254,011 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY — $1,138,297 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $1,106,164 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAState University of Iowa — $535,005 · OtherState University of IowaTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY — $471,458 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO — $355,599 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT — $354,826 · Other+5 more — $649,850 · Other+5 moreMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $634,402 · EducationMassachusetts In…DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT — $562,748 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIVERS…University of Kentucky Research Foundation — $247,513 · EducationUniversity of Ke…NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $185,167 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNI…+1 more — $42,295 · EducationUNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION — $248,000 · Health
Other$9,496,430Education$1,672,125Health$248,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $634,402 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT — $562,748 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION — $248,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation — $247,513 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY — $210,661 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $185,167 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $42,295 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION ↗
  • Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Institute for Pharmaceutical Technology and Education Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
  • United States Pharmacopeial Convention — 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines