· Public charity
National Fraternal Order of Police Foundation
The national fop foundation funds programs, including police week in washington d.c., designed to honor america's law enforcement officers, foster community involvement, and aid the families of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $55,010 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $80,510 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE STATE OF HAWAII ORGANIZATION OF POLICE OFFICERS BENEVOLENT FUND | $36,010 |
| GRAND LODGE AUXILIARY OF THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE INC | $12,000 |
| NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -10% since the first grant, against -41% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NFNATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE AUXILIARY9× · 2017–2025 · $431k · revenue -18% · 69% of their budget
- ESEASTER SEALS INC7× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue -10%
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC5× · 2017–2022 · $27k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- LFLOUISIANA FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $151k · revenue -41%
- FOFraternal Order of Police Texas State Lodgeone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -55%
- FOFraternal Order of Police West Virginia State Lodgeone grant, 2017 · $38k · revenue -47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fraternal group for Officers legal and labor issues.
Support law officers, active and retired
Support for families of officers lost
The mission of the minnesota fraternal order of police is to encourage fraternal, educational, charitable, and social activities among law enforcement officers and cultivate a spirit of fraternalism with mutual helpfulness among our…
Indiana concers of police survivors cops operates as peer support network for survivors of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty as determined by federal criteria.
Service fallen officer family
Provide death benefits, legal assistance and ongoing negotiation representation with city government to or on behalf of the police officers of the metropolitan nashville police department.
To cultivate the mutual friendships of fraternity, and desiring to foster and encourage the highest degree of skill, efficiency, discipline, and loyalty among the members
To improve employee-to employer relationship and improve the health and welfare of our members.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Louisiana Fraternal Order of Police Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Easter Seals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE AUXILIARY ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
- Who funds Fraternal Order of Police Texas State Lodge ↗
- Who funds Fraternal Order of Police West Virginia State Lodge ↗
- Who funds STATE OF HAWAII ORGANIZATION OF POLICE OFFICERS BENEVOLENT FUND ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
- Who funds FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODG ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PA FOP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE JERRARD F YOUNG LODGE #1 WASHINGTON DC ↗
- Who funds Beyond the Call of Duty ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE TENNESSEE STATE LODGE ↗
- Who funds SURVIVORS OF BLUE SUICIDE ↗
- Who funds SERVE & PROTECT ↗
- Who funds Running 4 Heroes Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Fraternal Order of Police Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.