Skip to content

· Public charity

National Foundation For Cancer Research

To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.

$3.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$870k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$19MScience & Tech$2.3MEducation$1.7MReligion$200k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $3,331,348, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,614,953 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $283,605 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
$140,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AIM HI ACCELERATOR FUND$870,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$352,092
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$250,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$230,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$211,120
THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE$200,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$152,340
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY GROSSMAN SCHOOL MED$147,983
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$140,000
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM$140,000
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHSTER$140,000
OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY$120,247
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$95,296
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO$62,257
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$61,088
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 47% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%ANGELINK: $150k → 10%INVAMET THERAPEUTICS LLC: $225k → 10%ONCOKIDS BIOSCIENCES: $100k → 7%GLOBAL COALITION FOR ADAPTIVE RESEARCH INC: $563k → 8%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $220k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $211k → 22%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $200k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHSTER: $140k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY GROSSMAN SCHOOL MED: $148k → 17%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $132k → 28%TVARDI THERAPEUTICS INC: $500k → 16%HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $140k → 21%KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $145k → 16%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $128k → 12%STROMATIS PHARMA LLC: $125k → 27%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $138k → 17%NONPARIEL BIOTECHNOLOGIES LLC: $375k → 6%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $100k → 22%AIM HI ACCELERATOR FUNDING: $3.0M → 8%SILCSBIO LLC: $100k → 19%INVAMET THERAPEUTICS LLC: $225k → 10%ONCOKIDS BIOSCIENCES: $100k → 7%GLOBAL COALITION FOR ADAPTIVE RESEARCH INC: $525k → 8%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $152k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $123k → 22%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $172k → 11%MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $140k → 16%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $120k → 12%STROMATIS PHARMA LLC: $125k → 27%AKROTOME IMAGING INC: $125k → 17%NONPARIEL BIOTECHNOLOGIES LLC: $125k → 6%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $100k → 22%AIM HI ACCELERATOR FUND: $1.1M → 8%SILCSBIO LLC: $100k → 19%INTERLEUKIN COMBINATORIAL THERAPIES INC: $200k → 10%GLOBAL COALITION FOR ADAPTIVE RESEARCH INC: $500k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $104k → 22%SCITECH DEVELOPMENT LLC: $250k → 21%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $114k → 17%AIM HI ACCELERATOR FUND: $1.0M → 8%RASIO THEREAPEUTICS INC: $400k → 19%INTERLEUKIN COMBINATORIAL THERAPIES INC: $200k → 10%GLOBAL COALITION FOR ADAPTIVE RESEARCH INC: $250k → 8%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $250k → 17%AIM HI ACCELERATOR FUND: $870k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $109k → 19%THE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTIT: $102k → 11%AIM HI ACCELERATOR FUND: $850k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
NC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 31 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
13

Total granted

$19M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+45%

Still filing today

52%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GLOBAL COALITION FOR ADAPTIVE RESEARCH INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $1.8M · revenue ×13
  • TS
    THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $872k · revenue +88%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $660k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • TO
    THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +45%
  • TT
    TVARDI THERAPEUTICS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500k
  • RT
    RASIO THEREAPEUTICS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $400k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
11
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
12
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornell University; the most unlike its peers is The Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
23/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AIM-HI ACCELERATOR FUND INC: $6,770,000 · HealthAIM-HI ACCELERATOR FUND INCGLOBAL COALITION FOR ADAPTIVE RESEARCH INC: $1,837,688 · HealthGLOBAL COALITION FOR ADAPTIVE RESEARCH INCTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $872,331 · HealthTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTEDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $659,731 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $565,500 · Health+4 more: $832,250 · Health+4 moreMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $1,753,153 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDNONPARIEL BIOTECHNOLOGIES LLC: $500,000 · OtherNONPARIEL BIOTECHNOLOGIES LLCTVARDI THERAPEUTICS INC: $500,000 · OtherTVARDI THERAPEUTICS INCVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS: $450,000 · OtherVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUSINVAMET THERAPEUTICS LLC: $450,000 · OtherINVAMET THERAPEUTICS LLCINTERLEUKIN COMBINATORIAL THERAPIES INC: $400,000 · OtherINTERLEUKIN COMBINATORIAL THERAPIE…RASIO THEREAPEUTICS INC: $400,000 · OtherRASIO THEREAPEUTICS INCALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC: $332,042 · OtherUTMD ANDERSON: $279,888 · OtherSCITECH DEVELOPMENT LLC: $250,000 · OtherSTROMATIS PHARMA LLC: $250,000 · Other+12 more: $1,422,625 · Other+12 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $774,905 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNI…Yale University: $695,061 · EducationYale UniversityCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $497,347 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERV…WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $321,197 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERS…OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $318,135 · EducationOREGON HEALTH & SCI…New York University: $276,816 · EducationNew York UniversityJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $253,966 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVE…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $250,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COL…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $140,000 · Education+5 more: $372,833 · Education+5 moreTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $500,000 · PhilanthropyUMASS CHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · Philanthropy
Health$11,537,500Other$6,987,708Education$3,900,260Philanthropy$585,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAIM-HI ACCELERATOR FUND INC: $6,770,000 over 6y, 56% of budgetGLOBAL COALITION FOR ADAPTIVE RESEARCH INC: $1,837,688 over 4y, 22% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $872,331 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $774,905 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $695,061 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $659,731 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $565,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $500,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $497,347 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC: $332,042 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $321,197 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $318,135 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $300,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNew York University: $276,816 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $253,966 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $225,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHONORHEALTH AMBULATORY: $222,250 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $140,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $101,924 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $87,497 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $85,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $85,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $13,412 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AIM-HI ACCELERATOR FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL COALITION FOR ADAPTIVE RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds HONORHEALTH AMBULATORY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA1.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Foundation For Cancer Research funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Foundation For Cancer Research. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to National Foundation For Cancer Research?

Find your warmest path to National Foundation For Cancer Research through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Foundation For Cancer Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph