Skip to content
National Eczema Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Eczema Association

NEA is the driving force for an eczema community fueled by knowledge, strengthened through collective action and propelled by the promise of a better future.

$688k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Science & Tech$843kHealth$525kEducation$35kRecreation & Sports$29k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $282,532, the rows itemized in this filing. The $688,173 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $405,641 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $144k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UC San Francisco$80,000
Boston Childrens Hospital$50,000
Emory University$30,000
Harvard College$25,000
Yale University$25,000
UC San Diego$19,987
John Hopkins Wilmer Eye Inst$16,668
Univ Pennsylvania$15,000
Childrens Hospital of Philly$12,550
University of Texas$8,327
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Phoenix Childrens Hospital: $17k → 11%Harvard College: $25k → 8%Boston Childrens Hospital: $50k → 16%Univ Pittsburgh: $50k → 11%Univ Pennsylvania: $20k → 22%UC San Diego: $67k → 11%Global Parents for Eczema Res: $19k → 14%University of Texas: $8k → 10%Yale University: $25k → 12%University of Utah: $10k → 8%ITSAN: $19k → 9%Emory University: $67k → 14%Northwestern University: $17k → 14%Allergy and Asthma Network: $19k → 6%John Hopkins Wilmer Eye Inst: $33k → 19%Boston Childrens Hospital: $47k → 16%Univ Pittsburgh: $33k → 11%Univ Pennsylvania: $15k → 22%UC San Diego: $50k → 11%University of Texas: $8k → 10%Emory University: $30k → 14%Northwestern University: $12k → 14%John Hopkins Wilmer Eye Inst: $17k → 19%Boston Childrens Hospital: $42k → 16%Univ Pittsburgh: $17k → 11%Childrens Hospital of Philly: $13k → 22%UC San Diego: $24k → 11%University of Texas: $8k → 10%Boston Childrens Hospital: $32k → 16%UC San Diego: $20k → 11%MA General Hospital: $67k → 16%MA General Hospital: $50k → 16%MA General Hospital: $50k → 16%MA General Hospital: $17k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
PA
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $243k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$105k · 43% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: Research

North America (Canada and Mexico)$63k · 26% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: Research

Middle East and North Africa$50k · 21% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Research

East Asia and the Pacific$25k · 10% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Research

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 10 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+17%

Still filing today

40%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    4× · 2020–2024 · $171k · revenue +76%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    3× · 2020–2022 · $100k · revenue +26%
  • EU
    Emory University
    2× · 2023–2024 · $97k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • GP
    Global Parents for Eczema Research
    one grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue -53%
  • MC
    Michigan Chapter Asthma & Allergy Foundation of Americagraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue +191% · 31% of their budget
  • IT
    International Topical Steroid Awareness Network Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue +18% · 26% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
2
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
7
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
8
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
9
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
10
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
11
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
12
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yale University; the most unlike its peers is International Topical Steroid Awareness Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $379,910 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $183,333 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO: $161,048 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGOJohn Hopkins Wilmer Eye Inst: $50,000 · OtherJohn Hopkins Wilmer Eye Inst+5 more: $92,481 · Other+5 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $99,999 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBUR…Emory University: $96,666 · EducationEmory UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $35,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVER…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $25,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows …Yale University: $25,000 · EducationYale UniversityChildren's Hospital Corporation: $170,570 · HealthChildren's Hospita…Global Parents for Eczema Research: $18,750 · HealthGlobal Parents for…International Topical Steroid Awareness Network Inc: $18,750 · HealthInternational Topi…Phoenix Children's Hospital: $16,667 · HealthPhoenix Children's…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $12,550 · HealthNorthwestern University: $29,030 · Recreation & SportsUMASS CHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $16,845 · Philanthropy
Other$866,772Education$281,665Health$237,287Recreation & Sports$29,030Philanthropy$16,845

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $170,570 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $99,999 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $96,666 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $29,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Parents for Eczema Research: $18,750 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMichigan Chapter Asthma & Allergy Foundation of America: $18,750 over 1y, 31% of budgetInternational Topical Steroid Awareness Network Inc: $18,750 over 1y, 26% of budgetALLERGY AND ASTHMA NETWORK - MOTHERS OF ASTHMATICS INC: $18,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital: $16,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $12,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Eczema Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Eczema Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Eczema Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home