Loading…
· Public charity
National Eczema Association
NEA is the driving force for an eczema community fueled by knowledge, strengthened through collective action and propelled by the promise of a better future.
$688k
Granted FY2024
10
Grants
7
Communities
$80k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of National Eczema Association’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
education research
2021
asthmaendsuffering
2022
education research
2023
umass chanchan medicaladviceagreementnamechangedmedical ummsf
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $144k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
- UC San Francisco$80,000
- Boston Childrens Hospital$50,000
- Emory University$30,000
- Harvard College$25,000
- Yale University$25,000
- UC San Diego$19,987
- John Hopkins Wilmer Eye Inst$16,668
- Univ Pennsylvania$15,000
- Childrens Hospital of Philly$12,550
- University of Texas$8,327
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 93% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 11 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
11
7
Total granted
$1.3M
$119k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+37%
+43%
Still filing today
45%
71%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBoston Childrens Hospital4× · 2020–2024 · $171k · revenue +57%
Univ Pittsburgh3× · 2020–2022 · $100k · revenue +23%- EUEmory University2× · 2023–2024 · $97k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- IITSANgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue +35% · 26% of their budget
- GPGlobal Parents for Eczema Resone grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue -53%
- AAAsthma and Allergy Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue +325% · 31% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Philadelphia University
To improve lives and provide students with exceptional value in 21st century professional education.
Education
2
Upmc
Support of subsidiary tax-exempt healthcare, education and research organizations
Health
3
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
To provide financial support to upmc children's hospital of pittsburgh.
Health
4
Pennsylvania College of Health Sciences
The college's mission is to educate for excellence in healthcare practice, leadership, and the continuous acquisition of knowledge.
—
5
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
Health
6
University of Chicago Medical Center
Our mission is to provide superior health care in a compassionate manner, ever mindful of each patient's dignity and individuality. to accomplish our mission, we call upon the skills and expertise of all who work together to advance…
Health
7
Children's Hospital Ophthalmology
The Foundation provides ophthalmology services primarily to patients at (see Schedule O) Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation also provides care for patients regardless of their ability to pay, as well as…
Health
8
Tufts Medical Center Physicians
The tufts medical center physicians organization, inc. coordinates the administrative and billing activities for the group practices in their mission of providing quality health care services to patients of tufts medical center, inc. and…
Health
9
Mcphs University
Mcphs university is a private, accredited educational institution specializing in preparing students for medical careers by providing intensive programs of study in pharmacy and other health sciences.
Education
10
Unmc Physicians
Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.
Health
11
University of Scranton
The university of scranton is a catholic and jesuit university dedicated to education.
Education
12
Children's Hospital Colorado
To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emory University and the most unlike its peers is Allergy and Asthma Network - Mothers of. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$866,772Education$281,665Health$237,287Recreation & Sports$29,030Philanthropy$16,845
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Boston Childrens Hospital ↗
- Who funds Univ Pittsburgh ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds Univ Pennsylvania ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds Harvard College ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds ITSAN ↗
- Who funds Global Parents for Eczema Res ↗
- Who funds Asthma and Allergy Foundation ↗
- Who funds Allergy and Asthma Network ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Childrens Hospital ↗
- Who funds Childrens Hospital of Philly ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation National Eczema Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Asthma and Allergy Foundation.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~28 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.2× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 382534175 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Asthma and Allergy Foundation, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 28 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 31% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to National Eczema Association?
Find your warmest path to National Eczema Association through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines