Skip to content
National Church Residences Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Church Residences Foundation

Originating from a christian commitment of service, our mission is to provide high quality care, services and residential communities for seniors.

$4.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$82MHousing & Shelter$2.3MHealth$438kCommunity Improvement$161kArts & Culture$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$57kReligion$11k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $167k
  • $250k+2 grants · $4.5M
$45,744
Median grant
2
States reached
$137M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES$2,445,830
FIRST COMMUNITY VILLAGE$2,100,000
BRISTOL VILLAGE HEALTHCARE$48,336
WATER'S EDGE AT BRADENTON$45,744
NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES PERM$35,000
WATER'S EDGE AT LAKE WALES$23,866
BRISTOL VILLAGE HOMES$14,205
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WATER'S EDGE AT BRADENTON: $46k → 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER ATLANTA: $80k → 13%TRADITIONS AT BRISTOL VILLAGE: $96k → 11%COMMONS AT LIVINGSTON II: $41k → 15%BRISTOL VILLAGE HEALTHCARE: $130k → 20%WATER'S EDGE AT BRADENTON: $37k → 10%BRISTOL VILLAGE HOMES: $74k → 11%BRISTOL VILLAGE HEALTHCARE: $61k → 20%BRISTOL VILLAGE HOMES: $59k → 11%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES: $17.9M → 15%BRISTOL VILLAGE HEALTHCARE: $41k → 20%TRADITIONS AT BRISTOL VILLAGE: $44k → 11%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES: $15.6M → 15%BRISTOL VILLAGE HOMES: $43k → 11%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES: $13.8M → 15%BRISTOL VILLAGE HOMES: $40k → 11%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES: $11.0M → 15%TRADITIONS AT BRISTOL VILLAGE: $39k → 11%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES: $9.2M → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES: $6.2M → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES: $2.4M → 15%FIRST COMMUNITY VILLAGE: $2.1M → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES CHILLICOTHE: $879k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENTS PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING SERVICES: $612k → 15%TRADITIONS AT CHILLICOTHE: $599k → 15%BRISTOL VILLAGE HOMES: $383k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENTS PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING SERVICES: $334k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENTS PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING SERVICES: $312k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES PERM: $271k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENTS PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING SERVICES: $234k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES: $219k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES: $195k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES FIRST COMMUNITY VILLAGE: $117k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES: $101k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES CHILLICOTHE: $99k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES CARE COORDINATION: $75k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES CARE COORDINATION: $70k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES CARE COORDINATION: $60k → 15%CENTER FOR SENIOR HEALTH: $59k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES PERM: $50k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES PERM: $50k → 15%NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES PERM: $50k → 15%BRISTOL VILLAGE HEALTHCARE: $48k → 15%CENTER FOR SENIOR HEALTH: $42k → 15%COMMONS AT LIVINGSTON: $41k → 15%COMMONS AT GARDEN LAKE: $40k → 15%BRISTOL VILLAGE HOMES: $39k → 15%FIRST COMMUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $36k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$85M · 19 repeat orgs$448k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
19

Total granted

$85M
$448k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+73%

Still filing today

68%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $77M · revenue +197%
  • FC
    FIRST COMMUNITY VILLAGE
    3× · 2019–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +45%
  • NP
    NCR PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING SERVICE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +118% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • TU
    THE URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER ATLANTA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $80k · revenue +58%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES
    one grant, 2021 · $41k
  • CA
    COMMONS AT LIVINGSTON II
    one grant, 2021 · $41k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Church Residences Chillicothe Land Holdings Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
2
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
3
National Church Residences of Rutland Vt

Originating from a christian commitment of service, our mission is to provide high quality care, services and residential communities for all seniors.

—
4
National Church Residences of North Fort Myers Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, our mission is to provide high quality care, services and residential communities for all seniors.

—
5
National Church Residences Homestead Van Wert Oh

Originating from a christian commitment of service, our mission is to provide high quality care, services and residential communities for all seniors.

—
6
Christian Care Mesa Ii Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
7
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
8
Christian Care Mesa Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Human Services
9
National Church Residences Somerset Lane Somerset Oh

Originating from a christian commitment of service, our mission is to provide high quality care, services and residential communities for all seniors.

—
10
National Church Residences Affordable Housing Mgmt & Services

Originating from a christian commitment of service, our mission is to provide high quality care, services and residential communities for all seniors.

—
11
Christian Care Tucson Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
12
National Church Residences Foundation

Originating from a christian commitment of service, our mission is to provide high quality care, services and residential communities for seniors.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Church Residences At Home Hospice; the most unlike its peers is The Urban League of Greater Atlanta Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
20/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES: $76,841,073 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES+2 more: $2,293,705 · Housing & ShelterNCR PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING SERVICE: $1,947,778 · OtherTRADITIONS AT CHILLICOTHE: $1,577,208 · OtherBRISTOL VILLAGE HOMES: $695,772 · OtherWAVERLY CARE CENTER INC: $477,879 · OtherNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES CARE COORDINATION: $228,297 · Other+28 more: $942,291 · OtherFLORIDA CHRISTIAN HOMES SENIOR HOUSING INC: $121,685 · HealthPORTAGE TRAIL CARE CENTER INC: $17,422 · Health
Housing & Shelter$79,134,778Other$5,869,225Health$139,107

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES: $76,841,073 over 9y, 20% of budgetFIRST COMMUNITY VILLAGE: $2,222,775 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetNCR PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING SERVICE: $1,947,778 over 9y, 28% of budgetTRADITIONS AT CHILLICOTHE: $1,577,208 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetBRISTOL VILLAGE HOMES: $695,772 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetWAVERLY CARE CENTER INC: $477,879 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetHERITAGE DAY HEALTH CENTERS: $157,527 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetFLORIDA CHRISTIAN HOMES SENIOR HOUSING INC: $121,685 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $80,144 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFIRST COMMUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $78,259 over 3y, 14% of budgetLAKE WALES RETIREMENT CENTER INC: $70,930 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTRADITIONS AT MILL RUN: $65,571 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES AT HOME HOSPICE: $44,118 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES OF BRADENTON FL INC: $36,222 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES AT HOME CENTRAL OHIO: $29,757 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES AT HOME INC: $27,783 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES AT HOME HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTRAL OHIO: $26,068 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRADITIONS AT XENIA: $23,640 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES AT HOME HOSPICE CENTRAL OHIO: $21,130 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPORTAGE TRAIL CARE CENTER INC: $17,422 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNCR AT HOME HEALTH AND WELLNESS: $11,201 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTRADITIONS AT STYGLER ROAD: $10,109 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTRADITIONS AT WESTERVILLE: $8,484 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES LINCOLN LODGE: $7,611 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES OF ROCK HILL SC: $5,433 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES TRANSPORTATION SERVICES LLC: $5,174 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

National Church Resid…
National Church ResidencesOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Church Residences

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Church Residences Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Church Residences Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Church Residences’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home