Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

New York · Public charity

National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc

To lead a national movement of exceptional, diverse public charter schools that teach modern hebrew to children of all backgrounds and prepare them to be successful global citizens.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2022
0%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$969k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$231,547
Largest grant, FY2024
$510,750
Organizations funded a year
3 to 7
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$3.1M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 0% of the organizations National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving3$969k0%
FY20223$846k0%
FY20214$573k25%
FY20204$1.6M0%
FY20197$1.4M14%
FY20187$695k14%
FY20177$1.9Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$8.0M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Harlem Hebrew Language Academy Charter School$2,718,398515%
Staten Island Hebrew Public Charter School$1,355,472511%
Hebrew Language Academy Charter School 2$1,315,31168%
Philadelphia Hebrew Public Charter School$1,090,959613%
Hebrew Language Academy Charter School$861,72473%
Lashon Academy$301,000210%
Agamim Classical Academy$115,00033%
Kavod Charter School$105,00027%
DC Hebrew Language Charter School$93,77131%
Hatikvah International Academy Charter School$5,0001n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHarlem Hebrew Language Academy Charter School: $2,718,398 over 5y, 15% of budgetStaten Island Hebrew Public Charter School: $1,355,472 over 5y, 11% of budgetHebrew Language Academy Charter School 2: $1,315,311 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetPhiladelphia Hebrew Public Charter School: $1,090,959 over 6y, 13% of budgetHebrew Language Academy Charter School: $861,724 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetLashon Academy: $301,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetAgamim Classical Academy: $115,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetKavod Charter School: $105,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetDC Hebrew Language Charter School: $93,771 over 3y, 1.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc with peer funders

About National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc

How much does National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc give?
National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc reported 3 itemized grants totaling $969,230, out of $1,020,858 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 7 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (100%).
Who are National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Harlem Hebrew Language Academy Charter School ($2.7M), Staten Island Hebrew Public Charter School ($1.4M), Hebrew Language Academy Charter School 2 ($1.3M).
Does National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc based?
National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development Inc is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.0M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Center for Hebrew Language Char School Excellence & Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home