Skip to content
National Basketball Athletic Trainers Assoc Fdtn Inc at a glance

· Public charity

National Basketball Athletic Trainers Assoc Fdtn Inc

The national basketball athletic trainers association (nbata) is a professional organization of highly skilled certified athletic trainers who provide specialized health care and critical support services to the athletes and organizations of the national basketball association.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$165kEducation$48kRecreation & Sports$32kPhilanthropy$30kYouth Development$10k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $45,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $50,356 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,256 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,100
Median grant
3
States reached
$875k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$25,000
FRIENDS OF THE GREENWOOD LIBRARY$10,100
NATA Foundation$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Thunder Community Foundation: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IN
NJ
DE
TN
OK
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$235k · 5 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$235k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+512%

Still filing today

80%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $135k · revenue +99%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE GREENWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $28k · revenue +26%
  • NA
    NEWARK ATHLETIC HALL OF FAME
    2× · 2018–2019 · $12k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • LH
    LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER - NEW ORLEANS
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • TC
    The Chest Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -94%
  • DN
    DIRK NOWITZKI FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue ×13
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brett Greenwood Foundation

The mission of the Foundation is to provide scholarships to support student athletes at the University of Iowa who are "walk on" athletes. The Mission of the Foundation is also to provide funds to the University of Iowa Hospital & Clinics…

Philanthropy
2
Schnitzer-Novack Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Junior Champions Foundation
—
4
Dnj Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Deutsch Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation
Philanthropy
7
The Drexel Fund
Education
8
North Carolina Sports Legacy Foundation Fka Promote the Youth Foundation
Philanthropy
9
International Tennis Hall of Fame Incorporated

The international tennis hall of fame (ithf) is a non-profit organization that preserves the history of tennis and celebrates to inspire excellence across generations globally. founded in 1954 in newport, ri, the ithf honors tennis'…

Recreation & Sports
10
Greater Philadelphia Cancer Foundation - Honor of Barbara Colameco
Health
11
Fox Chase Cancer Center Foundation

To prevail over cancer, marshaling heart and mind in bold scientific discovery, pioneering prevention and compassionate care.

Health
12
Terkeurst Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dirk Nowitzki Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $135,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCShelby County Health Care Corporation: $10,000 · HealthShelby County Health Care CorporationNATIONAL ATHLETIC TRAINERS' ASSOCIATION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL ATHLETIC T…DIRK NOWITZKI FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyDIRK NOWITZKI FOUND…FRIENDS OF THE GREENWOOD LIBRARY: $20,100 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE G…LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER - NEW ORLEANS: $10,288 · OtherLSU HEALTH SCIEN…The Chest Foundation: $10,000 · OtherThe Chest Founda…FRIENDS OF THE GREENWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $27,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF…NEWARK ATHLETIC HALL OF FAME: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHUNDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human Services
Health$145,000Philanthropy$50,000Other$40,388Education$27,500Youth Development$12,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $135,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ATHLETIC TRAINERS' ASSOCIATION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GREENWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $27,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetNEWARK ATHLETIC HALL OF FAME: $12,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetThe Chest Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDIRK NOWITZKI FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetShelby County Health Care Corporation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHUNDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 27% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Basketball Athletic Trainers Assoc Fdtn Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Basketball Athletic Trainers Assoc Fdtn Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Basketball Athletic Trainers Assoc Fdtn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home