Skip to content

· Public charity

National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such as energy, telecommunications, water and transportation.

$1.5M
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$238k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Environment$2.2MScience & Tech$857kInternational$620kCommunity Improvement$403kPublic Safety & Disaster$396kEmployment$307kRecreation & Sports$23kArts & Culture$14k
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $840,487, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,474,574 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $634,087 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $221k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $602k
$21,332
Median grant
7
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONVERGE STRATEGIES LLC$237,978
THE CADMUS GROUP LLC$153,246
PUBLIC SECTOR CONSULTANTS$90,760
ESTA INTERNATIONAL$67,650
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS$52,052
NEOS GROUP INC$48,168
JQ RESOURCES LLC$34,597
PLUGGED IN STRATEGIES$25,913
E9 INSIGHT$21,332
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ENERGY OFFICIALS$19,490
JQ RESOURCES LLC$18,020
JQ RESOURCES LLC$15,588
ELEVATED ENGAGEMENT$13,481
HUNTERSTON CONSULTING$12,825
JQ RESOURCES LLC$11,977
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ONI ENTERPRISES LLC: $78k → 15%THE CADMUS GROUP LLC: $153k → 8%CONVERGE STRATEGIES LLC: $264k → 16%PLUGGED IN STRATEGIES: $26k → 11%ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS INC: $79k → 10%NEOS GROUP INC: $188k → 14%TEXAS A&M ENGINEERING EXTENSION SERVICE: $23k → 22%SIEDLER CONSULTING: $55k → 15%BCS LLC: $40k → 14%JQ RESOURCES LLC: $55k → 15%PUBLIC SECTOR CONSULTANTS: $91k → 16%E9 INSIGHT: $21k → 12%LEONARDO TECHNOLOGIES INC: $70k → 17%POTOMAC ECONOMICS: $154k → 6%ENERGY VENTURES ANALYSIS INC: $58k → 7%EXETER ASSOCIATES INC: $135k → 6%EPOCH ENERGY ADVISORY SERVICES LLC: $19k → 8%ONI ENTERPRISES LLC: $67k → 15%THE CADMUS GROUP LLC: $140k → 8%CONVERGE STRATEGIES LLC: $238k → 16%PLUGGED IN STRATEGIES: $25k → 11%ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS INC (E3): $75k → 10%NEOS GROUP INC: $48k → 14%BCS LLC: $28k → 14%JQ RESOURCES LLC: $35k → 15%POTOMACECONOMICS: $103k → 6%THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ENERGY OFFICIALS: $19k → 7%NEXIGHT GROUP LLC: $66k → 8%THE CADMUS GROUP: $137k → 8%CONVERGE STRATEGIES LLC: $113k → 16%PLUGGED IN STRATEGIES: $22k → 11%ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS INC: $73k → 10%NEOS GROUP INC: $29k → 14%THE NATIONAL REGULATORY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $41k → 14%NEXIGHT GROUP LLC: $20k → 8%THE CADMUS GROUP LLC: $87k → 8%CONVERGE STRATEGIES LLC: $38k → 16%ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS: $52k → 10%FTI CONSULTING INC: $69k → 14%NRECA INTERNATIONAL: $104k → 7%MEISTER CONSULTANTS GROUP INC A CADMUS COMPANY: $451k → 16%MEISTER CONSULTANTS GROUP INC A CADMUS COMPANY: $200k → 16%MEISTER CONSULTANTS GROUP INC A CADMUS COMPANY: $150k → 16%ENERGY MARKET GROUP INC: $89k → 14%MEISTER CONSULTANTS GROUP INC A CADMUS COMPANY: $149k → 16%ENERGY MARKET GROUP INC: $54k → 14%MEISTER CONSULTANTS GROUPA CADMUS COMPANY: $135k → 16%MEISTER CONSULTANTS GROUP: $119k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
MI
MA
OR
OH
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
OK
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $110k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions, $88k to organizations and $21k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Russia and Neighboring States$43k · 40% · 2 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$39k · 35% · 2 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE · TEC

Sub-Saharan Africa$28k · 25% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissionerslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 16 repeat orgs$885k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$3.9M
$722k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+22%

Still filing today

13%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS
    5× · 2018–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +61%
  • CS
    CONVERGE STRATEGIES LLC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $667k
  • TC
    THE CADMUS GROUP LLC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $430k

Funded once

  • EA
    EXETER ASSOCIATES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $135k
  • MC
    MEISTER CONSULTANTS GROUP INC
    one grant, 2017 · $119k
  • TC
    THE CADMUS GROUP LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $87k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North American Electric Reliability Corp

The north american electric reliability corporation (nerc) is a not-for-profit international regulatory authority whose mission is to assure the effective and efficient reduction of risks to the reliability and security of the grid.

Community Improvement
2
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
3
Pipeline Research Council International Inc

Foster an international, industry-wide collaborative community that delivers innovative applied research, and develops the means for stakeholders to leverage/implement the research.

Community Improvement
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
Transportation Energy Institute

The fuels institute/transportation energy institute will deliver comprehensive and balanced research and analysis concerning fuels, vehicles, and related policy issues in order to create a market in which consumers can safely,…

Unclassified
6
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
7
Edison Electric Institute Inc

The edison electric institute(eei)is the association that represents all u.s. investor-owned electric companies. our members provide electricity for nearly 250 million americans, and operate in all 50 states and the district of columbia.…

Community Improvement
8
New England Conference of Public Utiliti Commissioners

NECPUC promotes effective state regulation through the dissemination and exchange of information, including opportunities to study utility and regulatory issues, and by providing forums for NE regulators to learn from and exchange ideas…

—
9
Northwest Power Pool

The northwest power pool ("nwpp") mission is to support electric reliability by providing cost-effective reliablity services, developed in cooperation with members, to member organizations across the west.

Community Improvement
10
Nreca Research

The mission of nreca research is to engage in privately funded scientific research activities focused on supporting, sustaining, and improving the electrical grid of the future.

Public Benefit
11
Alliance for Sustainable Energy Llc

The mission of the alliance for sustainable energy llc (alliance) is to operate the u.s. department of energy's national renewable energy laboratory to advance the science and engineering of energy efficiency, sustainable transportation,…

Science & Tech
12
National Rural Electric Cooperative Association

Nreca's purpose is to engage in the compilation and dissemination of information with respect to rural electrification and the furnishing of other services to rural electric cooperatives and others in connection with the coordination,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Association of State Energy Officials; the most unlike its peers is Institute for Market Transformation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS: $1,084,684 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERSCONVERGE STRATEGIES LLC: $666,670 · OtherCONVERGE STRATEGIES LLCTHE CADMUS GROUP LLC: $430,070 · OtherTHE CADMUS GROUP LLCPOTOMAC ECONOMICS: $346,201 · OtherPOTOMAC ECONOMICSEnergy and Environmental Economics Inc: $278,862 · OtherEnergy and Environmental Economics IncNEOS GROUP INC: $275,928 · OtherNEOS GROUP INC+26 more: $1,680,332 · Other+26 moreINSTITUTE FOR MARKET TRANSFORMATION: $12,079 · EnvironmentSmart Electric Power Alliance: $9,990 · EnvironmentREGULATORY ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $7,600 · EnvironmentInstitute of Gas Technology: $13,500 · Science & TechENERGY SECTOR SECURITY CONSORTIUM: $5,400 · Public Safety & DisasterELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $5,005 · Public Benefit
Other$4,762,747Environment$29,669Science & Tech$13,500Public Safety & Disaster$5,400Public Benefit$5,005

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS: $1,084,684 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetNRECA INTERNATIONAL: $110,455 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL REGULATORY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $40,936 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ENERGY OFFICIALS: $19,490 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetInstitute of Gas Technology: $13,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR MARKET TRANSFORMATION: $12,079 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSmart Electric Power Alliance: $9,990 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREGULATORY ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $7,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetENERGY SECTOR SECURITY CONSORTIUM: $5,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute: $5,144 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $5,005 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS ↗
  • Who funds NRECA INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL REGULATORY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ENERGY OFFICIALS ↗
  • Who funds Institute of Gas Technology ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR MARKET TRANSFORMATION ↗
  • Who funds Smart Electric Power Alliance ↗
  • Who funds REGULATORY ASSISTANCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY SECTOR SECURITY CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
  • Who funds ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA0.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Energy Sector Security Consortium: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $821k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners’ filings →

More from the funding graph