Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nathan Sadie & Harriette Warsaw Charitable

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2026still arriving
18
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$50kInternational$43kReligion$35kEducation$24kPhilanthropy$24kHuman Services$16kCivil Rights$12kScience & Tech$12kOther$0
02FY2026 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,447
Median grant
5
States reached
$576k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY AMERICA$1,447
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO CHICAGO$1,447
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$1,447
MAGEN DAVID ADOM$1,447
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION$1,447
CHICAGO THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$1,447
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$1,447
AMERICAN HEART ASSN NTNL BEQUEST CTR$1,447
ORT AMERICA INC$1,447
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$1,447
NORTHWEST HOME FOR THE AGED$1,447
ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND$1,447
Individual grant recipient$1,447
UNITED CHARITY INSTIT OF JERUSALEM$1,447
HADASSAH MEDICAL CENTER$1,447
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $2k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE IDF: $3k → 17%UNITED CHARITY INSTIT OF JERUSALEM: $2k → 20%DISKIN ORPHAN HOME OF ISRAEL INC: $2k → 11%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $2k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE IDF: $2k → 17%UNITED CHARITY INSTIT OF JERUSALEM: $2k → 20%CONGREGATION CHEVRO KADISHO: $3k → 14%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $2k → 14%MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2k → 17%THE GREAT THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $2k → 20%CONGREGATION CHEVRO KADISHO: $2k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE IDF: $2k → 17%THE GREAT THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $2k → 20%CONGREGATION CHEVRO KADISHO: $2k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE IDF: $2k → 17%UNITED CHARITY INSTIT OF JERUSALEM: $2k → 20%CHICAGO THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $2k → 14%DISKIN ORPHAN HOME OF ISRAEL INC: $2k → 20%CHICAGO THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $2k → 14%CHICAGO THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $2k → 14%DISKIN ORPHAN HOME OF ISRAEL INC: $2k → 20%ORT AMERICA INC: $2k → 17%ORT AMERICA INC: $2k → 17%ORT AMERICA INC: $2k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO CHICAGO: $2k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO CHICAGO: $2k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO CHICAGO: $2k → 14%JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY AMERICA: $2k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $2k → 17%JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY AMERICA: $2k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $2k → 17%JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY AMERICA: $2k → 17%NORTHWEST HOME FOR THE AGED: $2k → 14%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $2k → 17%NORTHWEST HOME FOR THE AGED: $2k → 14%MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2k → 17%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION: $2k → 17%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION: $2k → 17%HADASSAH MEDICAL CENTER: $2k → 17%HADASSAH MEDICAL CENTER: $2k → 17%ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $3k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $3k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $2k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $2k → 17%ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $2k → 17%HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM: $2k → 17%HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$213k · 17 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2026, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$213k
$1k

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
InternationalHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    9× · 2018–2026 · $15k · revenue +38%
  • IC
    ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC
    9× · 2018–2026 · $14k · revenue +133%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
    9× · 2018–2026 · $13k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
Israel Kuzminsky Memorial Foundation
—
6
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
7
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
8
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
9
Jewish Life Foundation
—
10
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
12
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Ort Inc; the most unlike its peers is Northwest Home for the Aged. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $14,682 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $14,681 · OtherIndividual grant recipientISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $14,456 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INCHEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM: $13,243 · OtherHEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEMJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $13,243 · OtherJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICAORT AMERICA INC: $13,243 · OtherORT AMERICA INCCHICAGO THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY BOARD OF DIRECTORS: $13,243 · OtherCHICAGO THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY BOARD OF DIRECTORSHADASSAH MEDICAL CENTER: $13,243 · OtherHADASSAH MEDICAL CENTERUNITED CHARITY INSTIT OF JERUSALEM: $13,243 · OtherUNITED CHARITY INSTIT OF JERUSALEMTHE GREAT THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $10,025 · OtherTHE GREAT THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYDISKIN ORPHAN HOME OF ISRAEL INC: $5,868 · Other+1 more: $1,414 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $14,683 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFE…AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $13,243 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHN…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $13,243 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KERE…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $11,829 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN …DISKIN ORPHAN HOME OF ISRAEL INC: $7,375 · InternationalDISKIN ORPHAN HOME OF ISRA…NORTHWEST HOME FOR THE AGED: $13,243 · HealthNORTHWEST H…American Heart Association Inc: $13,243 · HealthAmerican He…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $13,243 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $13,243 · Philanthropy
Other$140,584International$60,373Health$26,486Arts & Culture$13,243Philanthropy$13,243

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $14,683 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $14,456 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $13,243 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HOME FOR THE AGED: $13,243 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $13,243 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $13,243 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $13,243 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $13,243 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $13,243 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $11,829 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDISKIN ORPHAN HOME OF ISRAEL INC: $7,375 over 5y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HOME FOR THE AGED ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds DISKIN ORPHAN HOME OF ISRAEL INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nathan Sadie & Harriette Warsaw Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nathan Sadie & Harriette Warsaw Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nathan Sadie & Harriette Warsaw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph