Skip to content

· Public charity

Nashville Wine Auction

Nashville Wine Auction engages local and world wine communities to produce wine related events which raise money to fight cancer.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$215k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$5.0MFood & Nutrition$202k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.2M
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gildas Club of Middle TN$215,000
Blood Cancer United$165,000
American Cancer Society$135,000
Make A Wish Fdn of Middle TN$125,000
Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Ctr$100,000
Monroe Carell Child Hospital$100,000
Heimerdinger Foundation$100,000
Nashville Gen Hospital Fdn$88,000
St Jude Childrens Research$85,000
St Thomas Health Foundation$78,000
Survivor Fitness Foundation$40,000
HopeKids$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $475k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Make A Wish Fdn of Middle TN: $125k → 4%Make A Wish Fdn of Middle TN: $100k → 4%Make A Wish Fdn of Middle TN: $75k → 4%Make A Wish Fdn of Middle TN: $50k → 4%Make A Wish Fdn of Middle TN: $45k → 4%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TN: $40k → 4%MAKE-A-WISH MIDDLE TN: $30k → 4%Make A Wish Fdn of Middle TN: $10k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 13 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against -25% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$5.2M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
-25%

Still filing today

92%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $777k · revenue +4%
  • VU
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    6× · 2019–2025 · $768k · revenue +91%
  • ST
    SAINT THOMAS HEALTH FOUNDATIONS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $722k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • PC
    PEARLPOINT CANCER SUPPORT INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
City of Hope National Medical Center

To make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. please see schedule o for a continuation of our mission.

Health
7
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
8
Hartford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health
9
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
10
The Nebraska Medical Center

The Nebraska Medical Center (TNMC)'s mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health
11
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
12
International Cancer Advocacy Network

Ican's mission is two-fold: to optimize stage iv cancer patient survival and work to attain the highest possible quality of life. ican assists stage iv cancer patients with 1) direct patient navigation and customized advocacy services; 2)…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Middle Tennessee; the most unlike its peers is The Heimerdinger Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $776,994 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCVanderbilt University Medical Center: $767,500 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical CenterGILDA'S CLUB MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $712,500 · HealthGILDA'S CLUB MIDDLE TENNESSEEAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $502,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $443,250 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCThe Heimerdinger Foundation Inc: $201,500 · HealthThe Heimerdinger Foundation IncNASHVILLE GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $190,500 · Health+2 more: $165,119 · HealthSAINT THOMAS HEALTH FOUNDATIONS: $722,000 · OtherSAINT THOMAS HEALT…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $90,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SO…+1 more: $25,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $475,000 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WIS…Vanderbilt University: $118,500 · Education
Health$3,759,863Other$837,000Human Services$475,000Education$118,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $776,994 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $767,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT THOMAS HEALTH FOUNDATIONS: $722,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $712,500 over 8y, 12% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $502,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $475,000 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $443,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Heimerdinger Foundation Inc: $201,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetNASHVILLE GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $190,500 over 2y, 50% of budgetVanderbilt University: $118,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSurvivor Fitness Foundation: $85,850 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetHOPEKIDS INC: $79,269 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPEARLPOINT CANCER SUPPORT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 15% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds SAINT THOMAS HEALTH FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB MIDDLE TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds The Heimerdinger Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds Survivor Fitness Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOPEKIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEARLPOINT CANCER SUPPORT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Memorial Foundation Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · The Frist Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nashville Wine Auction funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nashville Wine Auction. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nashville Wine Auction’s filings →

    More from the funding graph