Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nash Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$718k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$1.1MCrime & Legal$220kPublic Benefit$100kInternational$100kHealth$68kArts & Culture$50kYouth Development$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $610k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$200,000
THE ROWAN CENTER$200,000
NEXUS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$160,000
NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND$50,000
AMERICARES$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$30,000
FRIENDS OF BOY SCOUTING GREENWICH COUNCIL$10,000
ARTS CONNECTION INC$10,000
BARNES RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB$6,687
FRIENDS OF MIANUS RIVER PARK$5,000
UJA FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK$5,000
ASPCA IN MEMORY OF NORENE FRIEDEN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 72% of grant dollars ($1.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 28% that went abroad ($457k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 28% of all-years giving ($457k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Uganda$280k · 3 grants
United Kingdom$177k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Nash Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Nash Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 28% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$800k · 4 repeat orgs$529k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$800k
$251k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
0%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $278k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’24’25
EducationHealthInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $400k · revenue +19%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue +19%
  • AI
    ARTSCONNECTION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • UF
    UK FRIENDS OF GEORGETOWN
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • WC
    WELLINGTON COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • NW
    NATIONAL WESTMINSTER B THE LISTENING PLACE
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
The New York and Presbyterian Hospital

To be a leader in the provision of world class patient care, teaching, research, and service to local, state, national, and international communities. newyork-presbyterian hospital is one of the nation's most comprehensive, integrated…

Health
5
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
6
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
7
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
10
Maimonides Medical Center

Maimonides medical center is dedicated to fostering healthy communities. we provide high quality, compassionate patient care and comprehensive community services. as a premier academic medical center, we are devoted to educating health…

Health
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
Montefiore New Rochelle Hospital

Mission: to heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve. values: humanity, innovation, teamwork, diversity and equity - our values define our philosophy of care. they shape our actions and motivate and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Mianus River Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEXUS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $280,000 · OtherNEXUS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITYTHE ROWAN CENTER INC: $200,000 · OtherTHE ROWAN CENTER INCUK FRIENDS OF GEORGETOWN: $100,000 · OtherUK FRIENDS OF GEORGETOWNWELLINGTON COLLEGE: $40,449 · OtherWELLINGTON COLLEGENATIONAL WESTMINSTER B THE LISTENING PLACE: $30,025 · Other+7 more: $73,987 · Other+7 moreGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $400,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $310,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA+1 more: $10,000 · EducationAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · InternationalNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $50,000 · HealthTHE BINA FARM INC: $2,000 · HealthARTSCONNECTION INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF MIANUS RIVER PARK INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$724,461Education$720,000International$100,000Health$52,000Arts & Culture$20,000Human Services$12,500Recreation & Sports$5,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $400,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $310,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROWAN CENTER INC: $200,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChild Advocates of Connecticut Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetARTSCONNECTION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOVERBROOK SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MIANUS RIVER PARK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BINA FARM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nash Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nash Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nash Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nash Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nash Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph