Skip to content
Nash Charity Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Nash Charity Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
58
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$415k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$19MPhilanthropy$15MHuman Services$680kYouth Development$676kInternational$516kHealth$464kEducation$408kHousing & Shelter$384kOther$0
02FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $405k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $329k
  • $250k+2 grants · $798k
$3,600
Median grant
9
States reached
$86k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD OF SACRAMENTO$414,500
Individual grant recipient$383,120
FRIENDS OF CHABAD TZFAT$126,393
CONGREGATION CHASDEI HAICHEL FAIGA$90,000
CONGREGATION BAIS MEDRASH KEREM SHLOMO INC$60,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH$52,833
OHR TORAH STONE$41,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
Individual grant recipient$38,000
Individual grant recipient$37,000
CHABAD OF NORTH BROOKLYN$30,000
CONGREGATION GIVATH SHOUL$30,000
JEWISH LEARNING INSTITUTE$25,000
GUIDELINE SERVICES$22,000
YESHIVAS DERECH HAMELECH INC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $259k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OUR PLACE IN NY: $15k → 13%MEANINGFUL LIFE CENTER: $2k → 12%MAKE-A-WISH INTERNATIONAL: $100 → 11%CHASDAY NAOMI USA FRIENDS: $1k → 16%JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF GREATER CONEY ISLAND INC: $15k → 20%CHAI4EVER: $19k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF GREATER CONEY ISLAND INC: $10k → 20%CHAI4EVER: $18k → 11%CORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS: $1k → 4%SAFE HORIZON: $55k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $2k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S BRIDGE OF ZICHRON MENACHEM INC: $10k → 17%VAAD HAKOHOL CROWN HEIGHTS: $12k → 20%VAAD HAKOHOL CROWN HEIGHTS: $12k → 20%VAAD HAKOHOL CROWN HEIGHTS: $12k → 20%VAAD HAKOHOL CROWN HEIGHTS: $12k → 20%MOTHERS OF CROWN HEIGHTS INC: $5k → 20%CHASDEI AVROHOM ELIEZER: $4k → 20%VAAD HAKOHOL CROWN HEIGHTS: $4k → 20%VAAD HAKOHOL CROWN HEIGHTS: $3k → 20%CHASDEI AVROHOM ELIEZER: $2k → 20%TEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH: $2k → 20%VAAD HAKOL CROWN HEIGHTS: $180 → 20%PROJECT LEGACY: $8k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $10k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $5k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $4k → 20%YAD SHIFRA INC: $2k → 20%YAD SHIFRA: $1k → 20%BIKUR CHOLIM OF CROWN HEIGHTS: $7k → 20%BIKUR CHOLIM OF CROWN HEIGHTS: $5k → 20%KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 20%BIKUR CHOLIM OF CROWN HEIGHTS: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$33M · 224 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

224 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 191 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

224
348

Total granted

$33M
$3.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+39%

Still filing today

19%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $598k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +123%
  • IN
    Israel Next Generation INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $610k · revenue +436%
  • CH
    CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $373k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • JH
    JEWISH HEALTH ORGANIZATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $230k
  • YY
    YAD YISROEL
    one grant, 2022 · $209k · revenue -73%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD SHLOMO INC
    one grant, 2023 · $196k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
5
Sherit Isroel
—
6
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
9
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
10
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
11
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
12
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chasdei Yisroel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ztm Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 598 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
45
Early backer (in before they grew)
109/122
Grantees still filing
85/122
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $8,721,816 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD OF SACRAMENTO: $8,213,366 · OtherCHABAD OF SACRAMENTOCHABAD OF BUSHWICK INC: $1,904,301 · OtherCHABAD OF BUSHWICK INC+164 more: $13,115,279 · Other+164 moreFRIENDS OF CHABAD OF HEBRON INC: $340,000 · ReligionKOLLEL TORAH INC: $282,800 · ReligionOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $168,100 · ReligionIGGUD MENAHALEI YESHIVOS INC: $139,000 · ReligionALL HANDS ISRAEL INC: $50,000 · ReligionVaad Hatmimim Haolami INC: $43,000 · Religion+3 more: $76,300 · ReligionTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $1,026,840 · Crime & LegalCenter For Justice And Human Dignity: $36,000 · Crime & LegalCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $373,387 · PhilanthropyUS FRIENDS OF YAD EZRAH INC: $310,000 · PhilanthropySAUL SCHOTTENSTEIN FOUNDATION C: $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $42,113 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEFESH DOVID INC: $38,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyIsrael Next Generation INC: $610,360 · Youth DevelopmentFriends of Chabad Tzfas Inc: $273,893 · InternationalONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $127,500 · InternationalGLOBAL JEWISH ASSISTANCE & RELIEF NETWORK: $55,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNEI BRAK HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 · InternationalChabad Lubavitch Hospitality Center Eshel Hachnosas Orchim: $27,300 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $20,000 · InternationalYeshivas Derech Hamelech INC: $20,000 · InternationalSAFE HORIZON INC: $56,100 · Human ServicesVaad Hakol Crown heights: $54,280 · Human ServicesCHAI 4EVER INC: $37,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF GREATER CONEY ISLAND INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $18,600 · Human ServicesOUR PLACE IN NY INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesBIKUR CHOLIM OF CROWN HEIGHTS: $12,500 · Human Services
Other$31,954,762Religion$1,099,200Crime & Legal$1,062,840Philanthropy$934,000Youth Development$610,360International$573,693Human Services$218,480

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $1,026,840 over 5y, 11% of budgetIsrael Next Generation INC: $610,360 over 5y, 17% of budgetJewish Community Watch Inc: $515,500 over 7y, 38% of budgetCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $373,387 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHABAD OF HEBRON INC: $340,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetUS FRIENDS OF YAD EZRAH INC: $310,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetKOLLEL TORAH INC: $282,800 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetFriends of Chabad Tzfas Inc: $273,893 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetYAD YISROEL: $208,700 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $168,100 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetIGGUD MENAHALEI YESHIVOS INC: $139,000 over 5y, 50% of budgetGEMARA ACADEMY INC: $130,300 over 5y, 35% of budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $127,500 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL INC: $125,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSAUL SCHOTTENSTEIN FOUNDATION C: $100,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetCHABAD GIRLS ACADEMY INC: $64,500 over 2y, 29% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC: $56,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL JEWISH ASSISTANCE & RELIEF NETWORK: $55,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetVaad Hakol Crown heights: $54,280 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNEI BRAK HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCAMP GAN ISRAEL NORTHEAST INC: $50,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetALL HANDS ISRAEL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetVaad Hatmimim Haolami INC: $43,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $42,113 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEFESH DOVID INC: $38,500 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetOholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc: $37,949 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCHAI 4EVER INC: $37,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCenter For Justice And Human Dignity: $36,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetAMERICANS AGAINST ANTI-SEMITISM INC: $35,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetWESTCHESTER TORAH ACADEMY: $32,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBRIS AVROHOM INC: $31,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTOMCHEI ISRAEL: $28,700 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetChabad Lubavitch Hospitality Center Eshel Hachnosas Orchim: $27,300 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF GREATER CONEY ISLAND INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMATAT MORDECHAI: $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNATIONAL ABLE NETWORK INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetYeshivas Derech Hamelech INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $18,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD OF SE MORRIS COUNTY INC: $17,380 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH LEARNING GROUP INC: $16,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetOUR PLACE IN NY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF CROWN HEIGHTS: $12,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Israel Next Generation INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Community Watch Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF HEBRON INC ↗
  • Who funds US FRIENDS OF YAD EZRAH INC ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Chabad Tzfas Inc ↗
  • Who funds YAD YISROEL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD SHLOMO INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel ↗
  • Who funds IGGUD MENAHALEI YESHIVOS INC ↗
  • Who funds GEMARA ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rebbe's Partnership F…The Rapoport Family F…Jewish Communal FundKolel Torah IncThe Ojc FundLets Make It Happen N…Barber Family Foundat…The Rav-Noy Family Fo…Jla Charitable Founda…Bracha Vehatzlacha Fo…Crain-Maling Foundati…Congregation Bh Inc
Rebbe's Partnership FoundationNY50.3× affinity24 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rebbe's Partnership Foundation · The Rapoport Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Kolel Torah Inc · The Ojc Fund · Lets Make It Happen Ny Inc · Barber Family Foundation · The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc · Jla Charitable Foundation · Bracha Vehatzlacha Foundation Inc · Crain-Maling Foundation · Congregation Bh Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nash Charity Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nash Charity Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Rabbinical College of America: 5% of income from government
  • Cornerstone Family Programs: 3% of income from government
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Ym-Ywha of Union County: 1% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 598 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nash Charity’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home