Skip to content
Napoleon Lodge No 788 Loyal Order of Moo at a glance

· Public charity

Napoleon Lodge No 788 Loyal Order of Moo

The lodge unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence and charity.

$224k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$170kPhilanthropy$167kHuman Services$66kHealth$25kCrime & Legal$12kFood & Nutrition$8k
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $190,025, the rows itemized in this filing. The $224,353 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $34,328 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $131k
$7,925
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC$71,300
UNITED WAY OF HENRY COUNTY$60,000
TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE$30,000
HENRY COUNTY HOSPITAL$7,925
SARA'S GARDEN$7,500
CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY$7,500
HENRY COUNTY SENIOR CENTER$5,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–26, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE: $30k → 9%TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE: $23k → 9%TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE: $19k → 9%TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE: $11k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$629k · 7 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -23% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$629k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-23%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthMembership BenefitHuman ServicesCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC
    9× · 2018–2026 · $241k · revenue +745%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF HENRY COUNTY
    10× · 2017–2026 · $227k · revenue -42%
  • TW
    TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE INITIA
    4× · 2023–2026 · $84k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • HC
    HENRY COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
2/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF HENRY COUNTY: $226,774 · OtherUNITED WAY OF HENRY COUNTYHENRY COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $17,699 · OtherHENRY COUNTY SENIOR CENTEROHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC: $240,890 · Membership BenefitOHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INCTOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE INITIA: $83,788 · Human ServicesTOGETHER WE CA…HENRY COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,674 · HealthSARA'S GARDEN: $19,399 · HealthCENTER FOR CHILD & FAMILY ADVOCACY INC: $19,399 · Crime & LegalHENRY COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY INC: $7,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$244,473Membership Benefit$240,890Human Services$83,788Health$40,073Crime & Legal$19,399Food & Nutrition$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC: $240,890 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF HENRY COUNTY: $226,774 over 10y, 13% of budgetTOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE INITIA: $83,788 over 4y, 16% of budgetHENRY COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,674 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILD & FAMILY ADVOCACY INC: $19,399 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSARA'S GARDEN: $19,399 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Napoleon Lodge No 788 Loyal Order of Moo funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Napoleon Lodge No 788 Loyal Order of Moo. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Napoleon Lodge No 788 Loyal Order of Moo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home