Skip to content

· Private foundation

Naphcare Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$208k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.8M
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $127k
$3,139
Median grant
6
States reached
$142k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY$41,737
SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$27,797
EAST VALLEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$20,000
JEFFERSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$15,070
NORTHWEST SHOALS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$11,294
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$11,230
MERIDIAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$9,144
WALLACE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$6,384
TROY UNIVERSITY$6,354
WALLACE STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,895
EAST MISSISSIPPI COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,371
ITAWAMBA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,000
MEDICAL CAREER & TECHNICAL COLLEGE$5,000
CALHOUN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$4,889
NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI COMMUNITY COLLEGE$3,329
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%EAST VALLEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $20k → 11%JEFFERSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $15k → 7%ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA: $15k → 13%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $645k → 15%BIRMINGHAM SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $15k → 16%NORTHWEST SHOALS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $19k → 17%AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT MONTGOMERY: $22k → 18%JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $16k → 19%SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $56k → 20%TROY UNIVERSITY: $19k → 27%POINT UNIVERSITY: $14k → 9%MAYSVILLE COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $19k → 20%MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $60k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA: $12k → 13%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $92k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $21k → 17%NORTHWEST SHOALS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $19k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $15k → 19%SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $28k → 20%TROY UNIVERSITY: $18k → 27%MAYSVILLE COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $15k → 20%MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $46k → 21%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $56k → 15%SAMFORD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $20k → 17%NORTHWEST SHOALS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $17k → 17%SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $24k → 20%TROY UNIVERSITY: $17k → 27%MAYSVILLE COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $14k → 20%MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $43k → 21%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $46k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $18k → 17%NORTHWEST SHOALS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $17k → 17%SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $23k → 20%MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $43k → 21%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $43k → 15%SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $23k → 20%MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $42k → 21%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $37k → 15%SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $16k → 20%MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $38k → 21%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $13k → 15%SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $13k → 20%MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $18k → 21%ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 18%MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
CT
KY
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
MS
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 40% of Naphcare Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 72% of the giving stays in AL; by stated purpose, 18%.

Naphcare Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 32% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 49 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

49 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
24

Total granted

$2.6M
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+47%

Still filing today

27%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE F
    8× · 2017–2024 · $194k · revenue +555% · 43% of their budget
  • Samford University
    5× · 2017–2023 · $48k · revenue +60%
  • PU
    POINT UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $14k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • S
    SEWANEE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Lynchburg

The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…

Education
2
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
3
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
4
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
5
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
6
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
7
Franklin University

Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…

—
8
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
9
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
10
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
11
Tusculum University

Building on a rich Presbyterian heritage and a pioneering spirit, Tusculum University provides an active and experiential education within a caring Christian environment to inspire civic engagement, enrich personal lives, and equip…

Education
12
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campbellsville University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jackson State Community College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $935,249 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYMOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $303,726 · OtherMOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $103,909 · OtherNORTHWEST SHOALS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $102,925 · OtherMAYSVILLE COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $88,128 · Other+57 more: $874,430 · Other+57 moreSOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE F: $194,196 · PhilanthropySamford University: $48,426 · EducationMississippi College: $10,000 · EducationCampbellsville University Inc: $10,000 · EducationKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationASBURY COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationTuskegee University: $10,000 · EducationHUNTINGDON COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $9,088 · EducationMARTIN METHODIST FOUNDATION (FORMERLY MARTIN METHODIST COLLEGE): $7,500 · Education+7 more: $32,243 · Education
Other$2,408,367Philanthropy$194,196Education$157,257

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE F: $194,196 over 8y, 43% of budgetSamford University: $48,426 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT UNIVERSITY INC: $14,416 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMississippi College: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCampbellsville University Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASBURY COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTuskegee University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTINGDON COLLEGE: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $9,088 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHarding University Inc: $7,963 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARTIN METHODIST FOUNDATION (FORMERLY MARTIN METHODIST COLLEGE): $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN UNIVERSITY AKA LINCOLN COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAULKNER UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStillman College: $4,791 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJackson State Community College Foundation: $3,862 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $2,452 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE F ↗
  • Who funds Samford University ↗
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds POINT UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Mississippi College ↗
  • Who funds Campbellsville University Inc ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ASBURY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Tuskegee University ↗
  • Who funds HUNTINGDON COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Council of Independent CollegesDC22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Council of Independent Colleges · Tulsa Community Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · The Mabel Amos Memorial Fund Regions Bank Trustee · Charles Eades Scholarship Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · The Simpson Foundation · John B & Brownie Young Memorial Fund · Independence Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Naphcare Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Naphcare Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Southeastern University Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Naphcare’s filings →

More from the funding graph