Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Nami North Carolina Inc

The mission of nami north carolina is to promote recovery and optimize the quality of life for those living with mental illness.

$511k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Health$330kEducation$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kCivil Rights$6k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $315,188 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $511,362 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $196,174 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $217k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$29,273
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAMI CHARLOTTE$90,050
NAMI GUILFORD$46,914
NAMI SOUTH MOUNTAINS NC$30,737
NAMI WAKE COUNTY$29,916
NAMI WESTERN CAROLINA$29,273
NAMI CABARRUS COUNTY$22,557
NAMI WILMINGTON$20,156
NAMI HIGH COUNTRY$19,445
NAMI CUMBERLAND HARNETT AND LEE COUNTIES$17,766
NAMI NW PIEDMONT NC$8,374
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NAMI WAKE COUNTY: $30k → 8%NAMI CHARLOTTE: $90k → 10%NAMI WESTERN CAROLINA: $29k → 12%NAMI CUMBERLAND HARNETT AND LEE COUNTIES: $18k → 16%NAMI NW PIEDMONT NC: $8k → 16%NAMI SOUTH MOUNTAINS NC: $31k → 16%NAMI HIGH COUNTRY: $19k → 21%NAMI WAKE COUNTY: $6k → 8%NAMI CHARLOTTE: $9k → 10%NAMI WESTERN CAROLINA: $5k → 12%NAMI CUMBERLAND HARNETT AND LEE COUNTIES: $9k → 16%DISABILITY ADVOCACY CENTER: $6k → 16%NAMI HIGH COUNTRY: $11k → 21%NAMI CUMBERLAND HARNETT AND LEE COUNTIES: $6k → 16%NAMI HIGH COUNTRY: $10k → 21%NAMI HIGH COUNTRY: $9k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$252k · 5 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$252k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-17%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NAMI - Charlotte PKA Alliance for the Mentally Ill
    2× · 2024–2025 · $99k · revenue 0%
  • NH
    NAMI HIGH COUNTRY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $49k
  • NW
    NAMI WAKE COUNTY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $36k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • DA
    DISABILITY ADVOCACY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nami North Carolina Inc

The mission of nami north carolina is to promote recovery and optimize the quality of life for those living with mental illness.

2
Nami White Mountains Az

We represent a community of people who are committed to relieving the pain and suffering of families and peers whose lives are impacted by a Mental Health Condition. The NAMI approach has been proven to work across the United States! NAMI…

Health
3
Nami Rhode Island

The mission of NAMI Rhode Island is to educate the public about mental illness; to offer resources and support to all whose lives are touched by mental illness; to advocate at every level to ensure the rights and dignity of those with…

Health
4
National Alliance on Mental Illness New Mexico

The organization is dedicated to improving the quality of life for New Mexicans who suffer from mental illness.

5
Nami Piedmont Tri-County

Our mission is to rebuild hope where it's been damaged or lost. We work with those in need, who are underprivileged, and underserved to rebuild hope and recovery for those affected by mental health conditions. Our focus lies on community…

Health
6
National Alliance on Mental Illness Utah

To improve the quality of life for individuals affected by mental health conditions, as well as their families, through advocacy, education, and support. We are committed to ensuring the dignity of those living with mental illness by…

7
Nami Frederick County Inc

Our mission is to provide information, understanding, education, and support for persons experiencing mental illness and their families. We are an all volunteer organization that provides its services and information materials free of…

8
Nami Mid-Hudson Inc

NAMI Mid-Hudson is a mental health organization dedicated to building better lives for Ulster and Dutchess County residents living in New York and provides Mental Health Education,Support and Advocacy

9
Nami Linn County

Improving the quality of life for people with mental illness

Health
10
Nami Boulder County

NAMI provides advocacy, education, support and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.

Health
11
Nami Eastside

NAMI Eastside's mission is to provide advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all people impacted by mental illness and mental health conditions can lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
12
Nami San Mateo County

Dedicated to improving the quality of life for people with mental illness and their families through support, education, and advocacy.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nami Western Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is Disability Advocacy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20182025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
0/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NAMI - Charlotte PKA Alliance for the Mentally Ill — $98,967 · OtherNAMI - Charlotte PKA Alliance for the Mentally IllNAMI HIGH COUNTRY — $49,237 · OtherNAMI HIGH COUNTRYNAMI GUILFORD COUNTY INC — $46,914 · OtherNAMI GUILFORD COUNTY INCNAMI WAKE COUNTY — $35,684 · OtherNAMI WAKE COUNTYNAMI Western Carolina Inc — $34,757 · OtherNAMI Western Carolina IncNAMI CUMBERLAND HARNETT AND LEE COUNTIES — $32,914 · OtherNAMI CUMBERLAND HARNETT AND LEE COUNTIES+1 more — $8,374 · OtherNAMI South Mountains NC — $30,737 · HealthNAMI South Mou…NAMI-WILMINGTON — $20,156 · HealthNAMI-WILMINGTO…National Alliance on Mental Illness Cabarrus County — $22,557 · EducationDISABILITY ADVOCACY CENTER — $6,086 · Civil Rights
Other$306,847Health$50,893Education$22,557Civil Rights$6,086

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNAMI - Charlotte PKA Alliance for the Mentally Ill — $98,967 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetNAMI WAKE COUNTY — $35,684 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetNAMI Western Carolina Inc — $34,757 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetNAMI South Mountains NC — $30,737 over 1y, 45% of budgetNational Alliance on Mental Illness Cabarrus County — $22,557 over 1y, 30% of budgetNAMI-WILMINGTON — $20,156 over 1y, 24% of budgetDISABILITY ADVOCACY CENTER — $6,086 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nami North Carolina Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph