Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

Nadindla Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$1,785
Largest grant, FY2025
$1,785
Organizations funded a year
2 to 6
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$6k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations Nadindla Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 33% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyPublic BenefitArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$3k50%
FY20244$78k50%
FY20232$12k50%
FY20222$1k50%
FY20212$4k0%
FY20206$3k83%
FY20194$16k50%
FY20183$2k67%
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$87kInternational$25kHuman Services$4kArts & Culture$2kPhilanthropy$500Education$500Health$360Housing & Shelter$360Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Hindu Temple of St Louis$76,3406n/a
Nriva Inc$25,00011%
Saweraa$2,02531%
Dhvani Foundation$2,00021%
Kuchipudi Art Academy Inc$1,45040%
Fortune Fund Ltd$50011%
Capital Research Center$50010%
Tax Foundation$10010%
Media Research Center$10010%
American Farmland Trust$10010%

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($13k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Nadindla Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNriva Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSaweraa: $2,025 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetDhvani Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetKuchipudi Art Academy Inc: $1,450 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFortune Fund Ltd: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCapital Research Center: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTax Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMedia Research Center: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Farmland Trust: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Nadindla Charitable Foundation with peer funders

About Nadindla Charitable Foundation

How much does Nadindla Charitable Foundation give?
Nadindla Charitable Foundation reported 2 grants totaling $2,785 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 6 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Nadindla Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (72%), International (21%), Human Services (3%).
Who are Nadindla Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The Hindu Temple of St Louis ($76k), Nriva Inc ($25k), Saweraa ($2k).
Does Nadindla Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Nadindla Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Nadindla Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Nadindla Charitable Foundation based?
Nadindla Charitable Foundation is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nadindla’s filings →

More from the funding graph