Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Naderkhani Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$131k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Health$197kEducation$165kFood & Nutrition$140kReligion$53kArts & Culture$24kHuman Services$23kInternational$8kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$30,000
CHINMAYA MISSION WASHINGTON REGION$25,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY COMMERCE FOUNDATION$20,000
SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT$10,000
MANNA FOODBANK$10,000
FOOD FOR LIFE NETWORK$10,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$3,000
WAMU 885$2,500
PBS FOUNDATION$2,500
CHORAL BOOSTER OAKTON HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
CA
VA
AR
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 23% of Naderkhani Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 12% of the giving stays in VA; read by stated purpose it is 4% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Naderkhani Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$509k · 12 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$509k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+7%

Still filing today

75%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ET
    EAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $152k · revenue +25%
  • TJ
    THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $120k · revenue +50%
  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $54k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • JC
    JONSSON CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • ND
    NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +7%
  • CI
    COLLEAGUES INTERNATIONAL (FEED THE FIGHT)
    one grant, 2020 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

2
University of Hawaii Foundation

To unite donors' passions with the university of hawai'i's (uh) aspirations by raising philanthropic support and managing investments to benefit uh, the people of hawai'i and our future generations.

Education
3
Friends of the American University of Afghanistan

Friends of the american university of afghanistan (fauaf) is a 501(c)(3) public charity that advances higher education for afghan students by funding academic operations, scholarships, extracurricular activities, and bridge programming at…

International
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
8
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
9
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

10
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
11
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pbs Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Choral Boosters of Oakton High School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $152,000 · OtherEAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION — $120,000 · OtherTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONSOME INC — $56,000 · OtherSOME INCCHINMAYA MISSION WASHINGTON REGION — $50,000 · OtherCHINMAYA MISSION WASHINGTON REGIONJONSSON CANCER FOUNDATION (UCLA) — $30,000 · OtherJONSSON CANCER FOUNDATION (UCLA)JOHNSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherJOHNSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION+6 more — $13,150 · OtherCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $53,500 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FO…FOOD FOR LIFE NETWORK INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR LIFE N…MANNA FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK…AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · EducationOakton Cougar Crew Booster Club — $4,350 · EducationChoral Boosters of Oakton High School Inc — $3,500 · EducationNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE — $20,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $17,000 · HealthPBS FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$451,150Food & Nutrition$83,500Education$22,850Human Services$22,500Health$17,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $152,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION — $120,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSOME INC — $56,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $53,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR LIFE NETWORK INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOakton Cougar Crew Booster Club — $4,350 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SOME INC
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds FOOD FOR LIFE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds PBS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds Oakton Cougar Crew Booster Club
  • Who funds Choral Boosters of Oakton High School Inc
  • Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Naderkhani Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Food for Life Network Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Naderkhani Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Naderkhani Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph