Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nacy and Rosemary Panzica Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$151kHuman Services$101kFood & Nutrition$68kEducation$64kHousing & Shelter$11kReligion$10kPhilanthropy$8kCommunity Improvement$68Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$16,000
HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE$15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$12,000
ROSE MARY CENTER$5,000
CORNERSTONE OF HOPE$5,000
REGINA HEALTH CENTER$5,000
GILMOUR ACADEMY$5,000
WOMANKIND$5,000
ST MARTIN DE PORRES HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER$3,000
SISTERS OF CHARITY HEALTH SYSTEM$2,500
FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $203k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $13k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $12k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $11k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $11k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $6k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5k → 17%ROSE MARY CENTER: $6k → 17%ROSE MARY CENTER: $5k → 17%ROSE MARY CENTER: $5k → 17%ROSE MARY CENTER: $5k → 17%ROSE MARY CENTER: $5k → 17%ROSE MARY CENTER: $5k → 17%ROSE MARY CENTER: $5k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $2k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $2k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $15k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $15k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $10k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $10k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $10k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $10k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $7k → 17%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $5k → 17%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $5k → 17%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $3k → 17%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $3k → 17%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$473k · 17 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$473k
$37k

Still filing today

65%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $77k · revenue +10%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +28%
  • RT
    ROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $36k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • AA
    ALZHEIMER ASSOCATION OF GREATER CLEVELAND
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • AF
    ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
3
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
4
Catholic Community Connection

Catholic Community Connection, an organization of Catholic sponsored education, healthcare, human services and senior living ministries, fosters collaboration to respond to the needs of all people within the Diocese of Cleveland.

—
5
St Augustine Manor

St. Augustine Health Ministries continues the healing ministry of Christ by promoting the quality of life and independence of each person entrusted to our care through a continuum of health care and related services to the chronically ill…

Human Services
6
Catholic Social Services Inc

Motivated by faith, catholic social services helps poor and vulnerable seniors and families reach their potential.

Human Services
7
Wsnchs North Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
8
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
Saint Mary Home Incorporated

We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. saint mary home is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.

—
10
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
11
National Church Residences At Home Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
12
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Saint Martin de Porres High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $77,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $58,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATIONROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATIO…CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INCWEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $14,500 · Human ServicesWEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTERGILMOUR ACADEMY INC: $37,000 · OtherGILMOUR ACADEMY INCBISHOP COSGROVE HUNGER CENTER: $23,000 · OtherBISHOP COSGROVE HUNGER CENTERFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $11,500 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEV…CUYAHOGA COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,000 · OtherCUYAHOGA COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARYST FRANCIS OF ASSISI GIVING TREE: $10,000 · OtherST FRANCIS OF ASSISI GIVING TR…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALZHEIMER ASSOCATION OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $10,000 · OtherALZHEIMER ASSOCATION OF GREATE…ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherARTHRITIS FOUNDATIONST VINCENT CHARITY: $8,000 · OtherST VINCENT CHARITYIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $4,068 · OtherWomankind Inc: $46,000 · HealthWomankind IncREGINA HEALTH CENTER: $32,000 · HealthREGINA HEALTH CEN…GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $61,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CLEVE…Saint Martin de Porres High School: $26,000 · EducationSISTERS OF CHARITY OF ST AUGUSTINE HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $5,000 · Religion
Human Services$203,000Other$136,568Health$78,000Food & Nutrition$61,000Education$26,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $77,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $61,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $58,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWomankind Inc: $46,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC: $36,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetREGINA HEALTH CENTER: $32,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSaint Martin de Porres High School: $26,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC: $17,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $14,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $11,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSISTERS OF CHARITY OF ST AUGUSTINE HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Womankind Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds REGINA HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Saint Martin de Porres High School ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds SISTERS OF CHARITY OF ST AUGUSTINE HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · The Fedeli Family Charitable Foundation · The Helen F & Louis Stolier Family Foundation · The Sam J Frankino Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · Connor Foundation · The O'Neill Brothers Foundation · Corinne L Dodero Foundation for the Arts and Sciences · Murphy Family Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland · Giant Eagle Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nacy and Rosemary Panzica Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nacy and Rosemary Panzica Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nacy and Rosemary Panzica Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Nacy and Rosemary Panzica Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nacy and Rosemary Panzica’s filings →

    More from the funding graph