· Public charity
Nabi Foundation
Create, encourage and support native american youth now and through their journeys as they discover who they are, what they want to be and how they can impact future generations.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k3 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $96k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER | $51,100 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $40,884 |
| AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY | $20,000 |
| MEADOWLARK LEMON LEGACY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| FRANCISCAN FRIARS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,500 |
| FT LEWIS COLLEGE | $6,000 |
| RUNNING STRONG FND | $5,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Nabi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nabi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nabi Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Nabi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Nabi’s filings →