Skip to content

· Private foundation

Myrtle Huplits & Woodman Huplits Foundation in Care of Todd E Peskin

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$1.2MAnimals$663k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $261k
$55,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHILADELPHIA ZOO$82,500
WILDERNESS SOCIETY$68,750
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$55,000
THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$55,000
WOMENS HUMANE SOCIETY$13,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOMENS HUMANE SOCIETY: $19k → 6%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $75k → 7%PHILADELPHIA ZOO: $113k → 22%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $75k → 10%WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $94k → 14%WOMENS HUMANE SOCIETY: $19k → 6%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $75k → 7%PHILADELPHIA ZOO: $113k → 22%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $75k → 10%WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $69k → 14%WOMENS HUMANE SOCIETY: $16k → 6%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $64k → 7%PHILADELPHIA ZOO: $96k → 22%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $64k → 10%WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $94k → 14%WOMENS HUMANE SOCIETY: $14k → 6%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $55k → 7%PHILADELPHIA ZOO: $83k → 22%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $55k → 10%WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $69k → 14%WOMENS HUMANE SOCIETY: $14k → 6%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $55k → 7%PHILADELPHIA ZOO: $83k → 22%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $55k → 10%WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $80k → 14%WOMENS HUMANE SOCIETY: $14k → 6%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $55k → 7%PHILADELPHIA ZOO: $83k → 22%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $55k → 10%WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $69k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $473,750 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETYSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $379,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATIONZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $568,500 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIAWOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $94,750 · AnimalsWOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTI…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $379,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY
Environment$852,750Animals$663,250Other$379,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $568,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $473,750 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $379,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $379,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $94,750 over 6y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Myrtle Huplits & Woodman Huplits Foundation in Care of Todd E Peskin funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Myrtle Huplits & Woodman Huplits Foundation in Care of Todd E Peskin. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Myrtle Huplits & Woodman Huplits Foundation in Care of Todd E Peskin?

    Find your warmest path to Myrtle Huplits & Woodman Huplits Foundation in Care of Todd E Peskin through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Myrtle Huplits & Woodman Huplits Foundation in Care of Todd E Peskin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph