Skip to content

· Private foundation

Myrl S & Bessie Evans Mather Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$81k
Granted FY2026still arriving
5
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$130kArts & Culture$95kHousing & Shelter$65kPublic Benefit$53kEducation$41kEnvironment$30kPhilanthropy$23kFood & Nutrition$14kOther$0
02FY2026 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$936k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDGERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$25,000
AURORA ADOPT A PET$20,000
GILTNER PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$15,000
HAMILTON CO AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY$10,900
BREMER CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 1% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VILLAGE OF HORDVILLE: $10k → 8%GIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $2k → 12%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $1k → 13%HAMPTON BOOSTER CLUB: $4k → 8%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $900 → 13%PHILLIPS MEMORIAL HALL CHARITABLE FD: $10k → 8%PHILLIPS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%AURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CO: $50k → 8%CITY OF AURORA: $50k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $31k → 8%BREMER CENTER: $30k → 8%PRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $30k → 8%BREMER CENTER: $25k → 8%EDGERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%HAMILTON RECREATION INC: $20k → 8%AURORA ADOPT A PET: $20k → 8%EDGERTON EXPLORIT CENTER: $19k → 8%HAMILTON RECREATION INC: $15k → 8%HAMILTON RECREATION INC: $15k → 8%AURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $15k → 8%EDGERTON EXPLORIT CENTER: $14k → 8%HAMILTON CO AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $13k → 8%HAMILTON CO AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $11k → 8%BREMER CENTER: $10k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 8%HAMILTON RECREATION INC: $10k → 8%EDGERTON EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 8%HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%HAMILTON RECREATION INC: $8k → 8%AURORA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $6k → 8%AURORA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $6k → 8%PLAINSMAN MUSEUM: $5k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 8%AMERICAN LEGION HAMPTON POST: $4k → 8%AURORA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $4k → 8%AURORA WRESTLING: $3k → 8%CITY OF AURORA: $3k → 8%AURORA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $3k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN UNITED CHURCH: $3k → 8%HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY AG SOCIETY: $2k → 8%HAMILTON COUNTY FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%GILTNER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15k → 8%GILTNER PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%GILTNER RURAL FIRE PROTECTION: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$376k · 9 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

$376k
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+8%

Still filing today

33%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureHousing & ShelterEnvironmentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HR
    HAMILTON RECREATION INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +18%
  • BC
    BREMER CENTER
    3× · 2024–2026 · $65k
  • AH
    AURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP
    2× · 2021–2023 · $65k · revenue -95%

Funded once

  • PP
    PRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INSTgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +35%
  • GP
    GILTNER PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • GR
    GILTNER RURAL FIRE PROTECTION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hamilton County Historical Society

To educate the public about the history of hamilton county, indiana and to preserve historic structures in hamlton county, indiana

—
2
Hamilton Community Improvement Corp

Improve community apprearance through purchasing vacant properties

Community Improvement
3
Hamilton Charitable Corporation
Philanthropy
4
Greater Hamilton Chamber of Commerce

To promote the hamilton area for economic development and business purposes.

—
5
Hamilton Rod & Gun Club Inc

To promote and enjoy rod and gun sporting activities

—
6
Humboldt Chamber of Commerce

Community development and industrial recruiting

Arts & Culture
7
Hamilton Arts Foundation Inc
Arts & Culture
8
Hamilton Vision Commission

To provide detailed and coordinated guidelines to the decision making process that will shape hamilton's future growth and the development of both natural and built environments.

Public Benefit
9
Hamilton Hall Inc
—
10
Hamilton Museum and Ranch

Maintain the area's historical data and the museum.

Arts & Culture
11
Hamilton Players Inc

Performance of theatrical productions using local talent and providing educational opportunities for the community. putting the spotlight on education, inspiration, and community through the performing arts.

Arts & Culture
12
Hartington Foundation Inc

Improving the hartington community.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hamilton Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Giltner Public Schools Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAMILTON RECREATION INC: $67,500 · OtherHAMILTON RECREATION INCBREMER CENTER: $65,000 · OtherBREMER CENTERCITY OF AURORA: $52,500 · OtherCITY OF AURORAEDGERTON EXPLORIT CENTER: $33,764 · OtherEDGERTON EXPLORIT CENTERHAMILTON CO AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $23,400 · OtherHAMILTON CO AGRICULTURAL SOCIETYAURORA ADOPT A PET: $20,000 · OtherAURORA ADOPT A PETAURORA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $16,305 · OtherGILTNER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15,000 · Other+11 more: $67,655 · Other+11 moreHAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,893 · Arts & CultureHAMILTON COUNTY…EDGERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureEDGERTON EDUCAT…AURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $65,000 · Housing & ShelterAURORA HOUSIN…PRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INST: $30,000 · EnvironmentGILTNER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $13,100 · PhilanthropyAURORA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $2,500 · Community ImprovementGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$361,124Arts & Culture$75,893Housing & Shelter$65,000Environment$30,000Philanthropy$28,100Community Improvement$2,500Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAMILTON RECREATION INC: $67,500 over 5y, 13% of budgetAURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $65,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetHAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50,893 over 4y, 12% of budgetPRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INST: $30,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $13,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAURORA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $2,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAMILTON RECREATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE PLAINS RESOURCE INST ↗
  • Who funds EDGERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GILTNER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AURORA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hamilton Community Foundation IncNE15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hamilton Community Foundation Inc · Bernard K and Norma F Heuermann Foundation · Dr James M Woodard and Mabel Woodard Trust · Robert & Bethel Kolar Charitable Trust · Frank M & Alice M Farr Trust · Wortman Family Charitable Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Myrl S & Bessie Evans Mather Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Myrl S & Bessie Evans Mather Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Myrl S & Bessie Evans Mather Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Myrl S & Bessie Evans Mather Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Myrl S & Bessie Evans Mather’s filings →

    More from the funding graph