How much did MYRA M AND ROBERT L VANDEHEY grant in FY2021?

MYRA M AND ROBERT L VANDEHEY reported 14 grants totaling $4,734,478 in its FY2021 IRS filing.

Where is MYRA M AND ROBERT L VANDEHEY based?

MYRA M AND ROBERT L VANDEHEY is based in WI.

MYRA M AND ROBERT L VANDEHEY

Foundation Dossiers

· Public charity

MYRA M AND ROBERT L VANDEHEY

Provide grants to qualified charitable organizations as determined by the board of directors.

$4.7M

Granted FY2021

Grants

Communities

$60k

Largest

01What you fund

0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2021.

Human Services$290kHealth$235kPhilanthropy$68kHousing & Shelter$50kFood & Nutrition$10kEmployment$10kOther$344k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

clothingcare

2020

health carescholarships financialfinancial aidcalumet outagamieoutagamie winnebagogoodsneedy

2021

foodfox valleyneedygoodsinformationscholarships financialfinancial aid

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2021 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k10 grants · $172k
$50k–250k3 grants · $161k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC$60,000
ST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$50,500
WOMEN'S FUND FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION$50,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE FOX VALLEY$39,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$25,000
TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC$25,000
ST MARY PARISH-APPLETON$20,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCOSIN$12,500
ST JOSEPH FOOD PROGRAM$10,000
YOUTH GO$10,000
LEAVEN INC$10,000
COMMUNITY CLOTHES CLOSET$10,000
MENOMINEE INDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT$10,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $275k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 9%. 11% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$773k · 11 repeat orgs$233k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$773k

$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%

+42%

Still filing today

73%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEmploymentFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BG
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE FOX VALLEY
4× · 2018–2021 · $151k · revenue +559%
CH
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
4× · 2018–2021 · $112k · revenue +128%
TC
TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC
4× · 2018–2021 · $110k · revenue +138%

Funded once

GF
GREATER FOX CITIES AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +42%
CA
CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICESgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +148%
HH
HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS
one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Community Foundation of the Fox

Public community foundation which enhances and supports the quality of life in the fox river valley area of northeastern illinois by providing effective and rewarding ways for donors to fulfill their philanthropic objectives.

Philanthropy

Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Fighting hunger, improving lives, strengthening communities.

Food & Nutrition

Goodwill Industries of South Central

Help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services.

Employment

Community Foundation of Fayette

To build a stronger fayette county by inspiring charitable giving, supporting nonprofits, and nurturing positive community impact.

Philanthropy

Community Council of Idaho Inc

To strengthen families in our communities by offering opportunities in education, housing, health, employment and legal services.

Human Services

Volunteer Center of Cedar Valley

To recruit volunteers.

Community Improvement

Family Promise of the Chippewa

Serve families who are homeless, or at risk of homelessness, by providing resources in the areas of emergency assistance, stabilization and prevention.

Human Services

Fox Communities Credit Union

We partner with our members, communities, and fox family to build stronger financial futures.

—

Central Adirondack Partnership for

Forum for community concerns

Community Improvement

Community Health Center of

To provide our diverse community with access to high quality, affordable primary health care

Health

Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—

Door County Community Foundation Inc

Inspiring people to give back to sustain and advance the community we love.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Fund for the Fox Valley Region and the most unlike its peers is Community Foundation for the Fox Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

14/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$344,213Human Services$289,500Health$234,500Philanthropy$68,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Employment$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Fox ValleyWI40.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley · J J Keller Foundation Inc · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family · United Way Fox Cities Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Doug & Carla Salmon Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Robert & Susan Brown Family Foundation · The Clarence Wallace & Dolores Lynch · Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc · Oshkosh Area Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MYRA M AND ROBERT L VANDEHEY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WOMEN'S FUND FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +71% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 203096562 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WOMEN'S FUND FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Myra M and Robert L Vandehey?

Find your warmest path to Myra M and Robert L Vandehey through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MYRA M AND ROBERT L VANDEHEY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Myra M and Robert L Vandehey?

More from the funding graph

MYRA M AND ROBERT L VANDEHEY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Myra M and Robert L Vandehey?

More from the funding graph