Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Ascension St Mary's Hospital

Creating healthy communities - together

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$671k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Health$2.8MEducation$188kPhilanthropy$31kCrime & Legal$30kCommunity Improvement$7kOther$52k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $720,836 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,419,073 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $698,237 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $671k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$119M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASCENSION ST MARY'S FOUNDATION$670,836
MICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE INC$25,000
SAGINAW FUTURE CAMPAIGN$15,000
MICHIGAN FORENSIC EXAMINERS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%BAYSAIL: $30k → 14%Field Neurosciences Institute: $393k → 18%DELTA COLLEGE: $91k → 14%SAGINAW COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 18%Saginaw Future: $17k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY: $7k → 18%MOBILE MEDICAL RESPONSE INC: $15k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY: $7k → 18%HOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF SAGINAW: $15k → 18%HOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF SAGINAW: $14k → 18%HOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF SAGINAW: $14k → 18%HOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF SAGINAW: $13k → 18%PRIDE IN SAGINAW INC: $7k → 18%MICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE INC: $25k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $21k → 18%SAGINAW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $17k → 18%SAGINAW FUTURE INC: $17k → 18%SAGINAW FUTURE INC: $17k → 18%SAGINAW FUTURE INC: $17k → 18%SAGINAW FUTURE INC: $17k → 18%SAGINAW FUTURE CAMPAIGN: $15k → 18%SAGINAW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $7k → 18%SAGINAW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6k → 18%MICHIGAN FORENSIC EXAMINERS: $10k → 18%FIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE: $8k → 18%FIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE: $6k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 7 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$2.9M
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-26%
+64%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAW FOUNDA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2.2M · revenue -60% · 38% of their budget
  • FN
    FIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE
    3× · 2017–2020 · $406k · revenue -16% · 48% of their budget
  • MH
    MICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $146k · revenue -30%

Funded once

  • DC
    DELTA COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $91k · revenue +143%
  • BS
    BAY SAIL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -91%
  • MM
    Mobile Medical Response Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +64%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
2
Saginaw Cooperative Hospitals Inc Dba/Cmu Medical Education Partners

The purpose of the corporation is to integrate medical education, research, and professional services for the training of medical learners (residents, students, and healthcare personnel).

Health
3
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
4
Mymichigan Medical Group

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
5
Great Lakes Bay Health Centers

To provide high quality health care to individuals and community groups in Saginaw, Bay, and other nearby counties. Services are provided without regard to race, beliefs or ability to pay.

Health
6
Mymichigan Medical Center Sault

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
7
Michigan State Medical Society Foundation

To advance the field of health for the public good.

8
Mymichigan Medical Center Alpena

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
9
Munising Memorial Hospital Association

The Mission of Munising Memorial Hospital is to be the provider of choice for primary medical care and hospital care for the residents of Alger County, with unsurpassed personal and professional intergrity. Our employees and practitioners…

Health
10
Mymichigan Medical Center Tawas

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
11
Mymichigan Medical Center Standish

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
12
Mackinac Straits Health System Inc

Providing quality healthcare to the families and communities we serve.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saginaw Future Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bay Sail Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAW FOUNDA — $2,182,688 · HealthMYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAW FOUNDAFIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE — $406,272 · HealthFIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTEMICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE — $145,500 · Health+3 more — $81,000 · HealthSAGINAW FUTURE INC — $97,500 · EducationDELTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $90,514 · EducationSAGINAW COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $27,950 · OtherSAGINAW COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY — $24,035 · OtherSaginaw Community Foundation — $30,800 · PhilanthropyBAY SAIL INC — $30,000 · Crime & LegalPRIDE IN SAGINAW INC — $6,750 · Community Improvement
Health$2,815,460Education$188,014Other$51,985Philanthropy$30,800Crime & Legal$30,000Community Improvement$6,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAW FOUNDA — $2,182,688 over 3y, 38% of budgetFIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE — $406,272 over 3y, 48% of budgetMICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE — $145,500 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetSAGINAW FUTURE INC — $97,500 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetHOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF SAGINAW — $56,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetSaginaw Community Foundation — $30,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBAY SAIL INC — $30,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetSAGINAW COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY — $24,035 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetMobile Medical Response Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN FORENSIC EXAMINERS — $10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetPRIDE IN SAGINAW INC — $6,750 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial FoundationMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial Foundation · Wickson-Link Memorial Foundation · Frances Goll Mills Fund · Morley Foundation · Bierlein Companies Foundation · Bay Area Community Foundation · Dow Company Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ascension St Mary's Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph