Skip to content

· Public charity

Musical Instrument Museum

The MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM (mim) enriches our world by collecting, preserving, and making accessible an astonishing variety of musical instruments and performance videos from every country in the world.

$73k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$711kArts & Culture$438kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$2kScience & Tech$2kCrime & Legal$2kHuman Services$1kEmployment$810Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $19,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $72,893 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $53,593 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$12,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$200M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACT ONE$12,800
SCOTTSDALE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OPEN HEARTS: $336 → 11%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA: $400 → 11%VALLEY OF THE SUN YMCA: $496 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
WY
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$663k · 45 repeat orgs$499k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
293

Total granted

$663k
$486k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+17%

Still filing today

7%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCrime & LegalHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PEORIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    3× · 2018–2022 · $49k
  • CU
    CHANDLER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTR
    5× · 2018–2023 · $45k
  • DU
    DYSART UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    4× · 2018–2023 · $44k

Funded once

  • MP
    MESA PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $22k
  • IE
    ISSAC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $21k
  • GP
    GILBERT PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Montessori Education Centre Charter School

Commitment to development of the whole child by providing students a well-rounded, individualized education and development experience that is grounded on Montessori principles

Education
2
Ball Charter Schools (Val Vista)

Arizona ball charter schools provides a personalized education to all students emphasizing comprehensive academic excellence in a safe, nurturing environment through partnering parents, students and staff.

Education
3
Ball Charter Schools(Dobson)

Arizona ball charter schools provides a personalized education to all students emphasizing comprehensive academic excellence in a safe, nurturing environment through partnering parents, students and staff.

Education
4
Prescott Valley Charter School

To provide a safe, positive environment for all students with a strong focus on academic success, student leadership, parental involvement, and community partnership.

Education
5
Ball Charter Schools (Hearn)

Arizona ball charter schools provides a personalized education to all students emphasizing comprehensive academic excellence in a safe, nurturing environment through partnering parents, students and staff.

Education
6
Arizona Community Development Corporatio

Education

Education
7
Montessori Day Public Schools Chartered

Montessori based school with the purpose to provide quality education to students in grades kindergarten through 8th. operates as a charter school under a contract with the arizona state board for charter schools.

Education
8
Accelerated Elementary and Secondary Schools

Operation of a private school

Education
9
Arizona Autism Charter Schools Inc

Education of students with autism and related disorders

Education
10
Kaleidoscope School

The Schools mission is to produce highly motivated students who will develop a pasion for life-long learning through the use of hands-on instruction, as an interdisciplinary, accelerated school that utilizes a proven, succesful curriculum…

Education
11
The Paideia Academies Inc

To utilize a family centric model to enlist the support of families in the education and upbringing of the whole child- academic & intellectual, recreational & cultural, character & leadership, emotional, physical & mental health- to…

Education
12
Montessori Academy Inc

Charter school

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Legacy Traditional School - Queen Creek; the most unlike its peers is Open Hearts Family Wellness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 339 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
22/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEORIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $48,976 · OtherCHANDLER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTR: $44,903 · OtherDYSART UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $44,200 · OtherPARADISE VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $40,622 · OtherALHAMBRA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $38,909 · OtherCOCHISE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $38,251 · Other+187 more: $838,939 · Other+187 moreEDKEY INC: $12,956 · EducationKaleidoscope Charter School No 4118: $1,800 · EducationMilestones Charter School: $1,776 · EducationLEMAN ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE INC: $1,248 · EducationACT ONE: $12,800 · Arts & CultureFREE ARTS FOR ABUSED CHILDREN OF ARIZONA: $1,377 · Crime & LegalBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC: $1,373 · Youth Development
Other$1,094,800Education$17,780Arts & Culture$12,800Crime & Legal$1,377Youth Development$1,373

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDKEY INC: $12,956 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACT ONE: $12,800 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetKaleidoscope Charter School No 4118: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlendale Union HSD Employee Benefit Trust: $1,610 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFREE ARTS FOR ABUSED CHILDREN OF ARIZONA: $1,377 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC: $1,373 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEMAN ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE INC: $1,248 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EDKEY INC ↗
  • Who funds ACT ONE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ55.1× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Arizona Diamondbacks Foundationinc · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Round It Up America Inc · Share Our Strength · Valley of the Sun United Way · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · American Express Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Kids Need to Read · Thunderbirds Charities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Musical Instrument Museum funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Musical Instrument Museum. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Musical Instrument Museum?

    Find your warmest path to Musical Instrument Museum through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 339 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Musical Instrument Museum’s filings →

    More from the funding graph