Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Murray Fred L Irrev Trust Ua

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$216kHealth$185kPhilanthropy$38kEducation$38kMembership Benefit$27kHuman Services$22k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$3,719
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLEASANT STREET UNITED METHODIST CHU$29,742
SWEETSER$7,435
INLAND HOSPITAL$3,719
SILOAM LODGE # 92$3,719
MAINE GENERAL HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER$3,719
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC$3,719
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$3,719
PINE TREE SOCIETY INC$3,719
UNITED WAY OF MID-MAINE INC$2,131
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,490
WATERVILLE AREA YMCA$1,490
THE IRIS NETWORK$1,490
MSAD #49$1,490
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,490
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SWEETSER: $7k → 9%SWEETSER: $7k → 9%SWEETSER: $7k → 9%SWEETSER: $6k → 9%SWEETSER: $6k → 9%SWEETSER: $6k → 9%SWEETSER: $5k → 9%SWEETSER: $5k → 9%SWEETSER: $5k → 9%WATERVILLE AREA YMCA: $1k → 12%WATERVILLE AREA YMCA: $1k → 12%WATERVILLE AREA YMCA: $1k → 12%WATERVILLE AREA YMCA: $1k → 12%WATERVILLE AREA YMCA: $1k → 12%WATERVILLE AREA YMCA: $1k → 12%WATERVILLE AREA YMCA: $1k → 12%WATERVILLE AREA YMCA: $990 → 12%WATERVILLE AREA YMCA: $975 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$525k · 17 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
0

Total granted

$525k
$0

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    Sweetser
    9× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +4%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +132%
  • PT
    PINE TREE SOCIETY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +102%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Eastern Maine Medical Center Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Cen

    Eastern Maine Medical Center d/b/a Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Center strives to provide exceptional primary and specialty healthcare with a passionate pursuit of excellence in patient safety, clinical quality, and service. Our…

    Health
    2
    Lakewood Northern Light Continuing Care Lakewood

    Lakewood d/b/a Northern Light Continuing Care Lakewood is a 105 bed long-term care facility that provides skilled, dementia and long-term nursing care.

    Health
    3
    Eastern Maine Healthcare Systems Northern Light Health

    EMHS d/b/a Northern Light Health, a supporting organization for healthcare affiliates, maintains and improves the health and well-being of the people of Maine through a well-organized network of local health care providers who together…

    4
    MaineHealth

    MaineHealth is a voluntary, not-for-profit community and referral system of hospitals, dedicated to providing high quality health care services to all persons who seek care regardless of their sex, race, religion, age, color, sexual…

    Health
    5
    Vna Home Health & Hospice Northern Light Home Care & Hospice

    VNA Home Health & Hospice d/b/a Northern Light Home Care & Hospice provides clinically excellent, compassionate home health and hospice care to individuals and families

    Health
    6
    Rhode Island Hospital

    As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, RIH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

    Health
    7
    Acadia Hospital Corp Northern Light Acadia Hospital

    The primary mission and significant activities of Acadia Hospital, Corp. d/b/a Northern Light Acadia Hospital are the provision of inpatient and outpatient psychiatric and mental health services to children, adolescents, and adults.

    Health
    8
    Sebasticook Valley Health Northern Light Sebasticook Valley Hosp

    Sebasticook Valley Health d/b/a Northern Light Sebasticook Valley Hospital is a critical access hospital whose mission is to be the regional leader in meeting the health needs of our communities, providing quality care, always treating…

    Health
    9
    Penobscot Community Health Center

    Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…

    Health
    10
    Mercy Hospital Northern Light Mercy Hospital

    Mercy Hospital d/b/a Northern Light Mercy Hospital carries out the healing work of Christ by providing clinically excellent, compassionate healthcare for all, with special concern for the poor and disadvantaged.

    Health
    11
    The Blue Hill Memorial Hospital Northern Light Blue Hill Hospital

    The Blue Hill Memorial Hospital d/b/a Northern Light Blue Hill Hospital is dedicated to improving the health and wellness of our communities by providing primary and specialty health care of outstanding quality and caring for our patients…

    Health
    12
    The Aroostook Medical Center Northern Light Ar Gould Hospital

    The mission of the aroostook medical center d/b/a northern light a.r. gould hospital is to restore, maintain, and improve the health of our friends and neighbors in a compassionate and professional environment.

    Health

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sweetser and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/9
    Grantees still filing
    6/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    PLEASANT ST UNITED METHODIST CHU — $139,600 · OtherPLEASANT ST UNITED METHODIST CHUPLEASANT STREET UNITED METHODIST CHU — $76,244 · OtherPLEASANT STREET UNITED METHODIST CHUUNITED WAY OF MID-MAINE — $37,908 · OtherUNITED WAY OF MID-MAINESILOAM LODGE # 92 — $27,216 · OtherSILOAM LODGE # 92AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $17,686 · OtherMAINE GENERAL MEDICAL CENT — $17,686 · Other+4 more — $42,233 · Other+4 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $27,216 · HealthDana-Farber Canc…INLAND HOSPITAL NORTHERN LIGHT INLAND HOSPITAL — $27,216 · HealthINLAND HOSPITAL …American Heart Association Inc — $10,900 · HealthAmerican Heart A…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $9,533 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER …Sweetser — $53,970 · Human ServicesSweetserWATERVILLE AREA YMCA — $10,900 · Human ServicesWATERVILLE ARE…PINE TREE SOCIETY INC — $26,770 · Education
    Other$358,573Health$74,865Human Services$64,870Education$26,770

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSweetser — $53,970 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MID-MAINE — $37,908 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $27,216 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINLAND HOSPITAL NORTHERN LIGHT INLAND HOSPITAL — $27,216 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPINE TREE SOCIETY INC — $26,770 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Iris Network — $10,900 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWATERVILLE AREA YMCA — $10,900 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $9,533 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Sweetser
    • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MID-MAINE
    • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    • Who funds INLAND HOSPITAL NORTHERN LIGHT INLAND HOSPITAL
    • Who funds PINE TREE SOCIETY INC
    • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
    • Who funds The Iris Network
    • Who funds WATERVILLE AREA YMCA
    • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Bangor Savings Bank FoundationME13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Murray Fred L Irrev Trust Ua funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
    • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph