Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mueller Brass Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$135kPhilanthropy$39kHuman Services$23kCommunity Improvement$17kYouth Development$17kArts & Culture$11kEducation$9kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$130k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Way of St Clair County$5,000
Tipton County Schools Techincal Dep$4,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Covington Boys and Girls Club$2,500
Go Lucy Go Foundation$2,500
Carl Perkins Center$2,000
Itawamba Community College Foundati$2,000
Covington Lions Club$2,000
Covington TN Rotary Club$2,000
Covington TN Rotary Club$1,600
McLaren Port Huron Foundation$1,000
McLaren Port Huron Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Palmer Home for Children: $3k → 10%Go Lucy Go Foundation: $3k → 14%Go Lucy Go Foundation: $3k → 14%Go Lucy Go Foundation: $3k → 14%Go Lucy Go Foundation: $3k → 14%Go Lucy Go Foundation: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$226k · 14 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
14

Total granted

$226k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+265%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LeBonheur Children's Hospital
    2× · 2020–2022 · $100k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ST CLAIR COUNTY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue -38%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2020–2024 · $21k

Funded once

  • TC
    THE COPPER CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +947% · 36% of their budget
  • LC
    LeBonheur Children's Hospital Found
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SH
    Safe Harbor Tipton County
    one grant, 2021 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake Champlain Land Trust Inc

The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…

Environment
2
Urban Land Conservancy

Urban land conservancy's mission is to acquire, develop, and/or preserve community assets in urban areas for a variety of community needs especially in high poverty, low-income, underserved, at-risk communities.

Community Improvement
3
Albany County Land Bank Corporation

The albany county land bank facilitates the process of acquiring, improving and redistributing vacant and abandoned properties to eliminate the harms and liabilities caused by such properties and return them to productive use, while being…

Housing & Shelter
4
Otsego Land Trust

Otsego Land Trust conserves our region's natural heritage of woodlands, farmlands and waters that sustain rural communities, promote public health, support wildlife diversity and inspire the human spirit.

Environment
5
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
6
Ottawa County Parks Foundation Inc

To raise funds to be used for the improvement, expansion, and promotion of parks and open spaces in ottawa county.

Recreation & Sports
7
Upper Valley Land Trust Inc

The upper valley land trust helps people conserve land. uvlt provides conservation leadership, tools and expertise to permanently protect working farms, forested ridges, wildlife habitat, water resources, trails and scenic landscapes. see…

Environment
8
Otsego County Conservation Association Inc

OCCA is dedicated to promoting the enjoyment and sustainable use of Otsego County's natural resources through education, advocacy, resource management, research, planning and practice.

Environment
9
Harford Land Trust Inc

The preservation of land and conservation of natural resources for public enjoyment and passive recreation.

Environment
10
Upper Charles Conservation Land Trust Inc

To promote land conversvation and stewardship to benefit the general public (hiking trails, free of charge land to protect natural resources (water and wildlife).

11
The Central New York Land Trust Inc

The central new york land trust seeks to preserve and protect natural areas in order to provide our communities clean water, clean air, wildlife habitat, and a chance to connect with the land.

Environment
12
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of St Clair County and the most unlike its peers is Itawamba Community College Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LeBonheur Children's Hospital — $100,000 · OtherLeBonheur Children's HospitalIndividual grant recipient — $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCovington Boys and Girls Club — $12,500 · OtherCovington Boys and Girls ClubCOVINGTON LIONS CLUB — $11,000 · OtherLeBonheur Children's Hospital Found — $10,000 · OtherCovington TN Rotary Club — $9,600 · OtherCarl Perkins Center — $9,000 · Other+15 more — $35,300 · Other+15 moreUNITED WAY OF ST CLAIR COUNTY — $30,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY O…CREATE FOUNDATION — $2,000 · PhilanthropyCREATE FOUND…THE COPPER CLUB INC — $25,000 · HealthTHE COPPE…GO LUCY GO FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 · Human ServicesPALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN — $5,000 · Human ServicesITAWAMBA CROSSROADS RANCH — $2,000 · Housing & ShelterOVERTON PARK CONSERVANCY — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsORANGE COUNTY LAND TRUST INC — $1,000 · Environment
Other$208,400Philanthropy$32,000Health$25,000Human Services$17,500Housing & Shelter$2,000Recreation & Sports$1,000Environment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF ST CLAIR COUNTY — $30,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE COPPER CLUB INC — $25,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetGO LUCY GO FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetPALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetITAWAMBA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetITAWAMBA CROSSROADS RANCH — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCREATE FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOVERTON PARK CONSERVANCY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY LAND TRUST INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ST CLAIR COUNTY
  • Who funds THE COPPER CLUB INC
  • Who funds GO LUCY GO FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds ITAWAMBA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ITAWAMBA CROSSROADS RANCH
  • Who funds CREATE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OVERTON PARK CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY LAND TRUST INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mueller Brass Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mueller Brass Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mueller Brass Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph