Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ms Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2022
20
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$6k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

57% of Ms Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Donors Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Ms Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $33k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

17
’21
10
’22
2
’23
2
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$316kInternational$200kReligion$65kEducation$22kCommunity Improvement$2kHealth$970Food & Nutrition$360Human Services$318Other$0
02FY2022 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$504
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL$5,605
Individual grant recipient$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,130
BAIS MEDRASH RUACH CHAIM$5,000
VARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS - AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST$4,076
SUPPORTERS OF TORAH$3,000
KEREN HASHVIIS$1,300
NEFESH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$600
AREIVIM USA$504
CHASDEI SHIMON INC$360
TOMCHEI TZEDAKAH$200
MESIVTA OF EATONTOWN$180
CHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC$180
CHAI LIFELINE$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $690) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%A TIME: $180 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $150 → 20%CHASDEI SHIMON INC: $360 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CA
MD
AZ
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$79k · 12 repeat orgs$274k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
35

Total granted

$79k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+11%

Still filing today

25%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $17k · revenue +14%
  • BM
    BAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP
    2× · 2021–2022 · $528 · revenue +36%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $360 · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • FM
    FIRST MESIFTA OF CANADA
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • CS
    CONG STOLIN KARLIN LAKEWOOD
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • T
    TAHAREINU
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
3
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
4
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
5
Tzohar Halev Inc

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

Education
6
Hashevaynu Inc

The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.

Education
7
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
8
Chevrah Lomdei Mishnah Inc

Promoting study of Mishnah and other Jewish texts

Religion
9
Hayashar Vehatov Inc

The furtherance of primacy of orthodox jewish jurisprudence

Religion
10
Mifal Tzedaka Vchesed Chasdei Aharo N Inc

Provide financial assistance to torah and talmudic scholars, as well as to other needy individuals and other organizations that work to promote these purposes.

Philanthropy
11
Yeshiva Gedola Na'os Yaakov

A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study

Education
12
Chaverim Israel Family Services Inc

To provide medical support to families in need

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vaad Harabbanim L'inyanei Tzeduka Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mesivta of North Jersey Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INC: $200,000 · OtherKOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INCVARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS: $26,116 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONSCONGREGATION CHOMAS YEHOSHUA: $25,000 · OtherCONGREGATION CHOMAS YEHOSHUAIndividual grant recipient: $11,500 · Other+39 more: $62,346 · Other+39 moreDONORS FUND INC: $280,500 · PhilanthropyDONORS FUND INCLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $16,505 · EducationBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $4,860 · EducationMESIVTA OF NORTH JERSEY INC: $1,000 · Education+2 more: $448 · EducationKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,300 · ReligionBAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP: $528 · ReligionVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $512 · ReligionKEREN ZICHRON YOSEF INC: $500 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $318 · Religion+3 more: $218 · ReligionCHASDEI SHIMON INC: $360 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $180 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $150 · Human ServicesCHAI LIFELINE INC: $360 · HealthCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $180 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $360 · International
Other$324,962Philanthropy$280,500Education$22,813Religion$3,376Human Services$690Health$540International$360

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONORS FUND INC: $280,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $16,505 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $4,860 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESIVTA OF NORTH JERSEY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP: $528 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $512 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN ZICHRON YOSEF INC: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHASDEI SHIMON INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC: $348 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $318 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATSKILLS HATZALAH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHashkifa: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HASHVIIS INC ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA OF NORTH JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP ↗
  • Who funds VAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN ZICHRON YOSEF INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASDEI SHIMON INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds DRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP ↗
  • Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Fund IncNJ19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Fund Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Eycy Fund Inc · The Sorala Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · Sheena Foundation · The Yale Fishman Family Foundation · Toras Chesed Inc · The Fishoff Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ms Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ms Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ms Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph