Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mount Clemens Kiwanis Club Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$56kArts & Culture$25kYouth Development$15kEducation$9kHealth$8kPhilanthropy$5kRecreation & Sports$5kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$109k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Various-500 or less$3,996
Maggie's Wigs for Kids$3,000
Packard Motor Car Foundation$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Macomb Family YMCA$1,250
Kiwanis of Michigan Foundation$1,200
Turning Point$1,000
Anton Art Center$1,000
Crocker House$1,000
Hearts for Homes$1,000
Macomb Foster Closet$1,000
Neway Works$750
Mount Clemens Fire Department$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Wigs 4 Kids: $2k → 10%Turning Point: $2k → 10%WIGS 4 KIDS: $2k → 10%Macomb Family YMCA: $1k → 10%Macomb Family YMCA: $1k → 10%Macomb Foster Closet: $1k → 10%Macomb Family YMCA: $1k → 10%Turning Point: $1k → 10%Turning Point: $1k → 10%Turning Point: $1k → 10%Macomb Foster Closet: $800 → 10%Macomb Family YMCA: $700 → 10%WIGS 4 KIDS: $3k → 10%Maggie's Wigs for Kids: $3k → 10%Maggie's Wigs for Kids: $3k → 10%Maggie's Wigs for Kids: $2k → 10%Maggie's Wigs for Kids: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$117k · 20 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$117k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+43%

Still filing today

45%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TURNING POINT INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +19%
  • YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +16%
  • MC
    MACOMB COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • MP
    Metro Park Splash Pad
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • 3
    3464
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Foster Care Closet

Provide support, services and aid to current, future and past foster, adoptive and relative parents who are or were in the foster care system.

Human Services
2
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
3
Mittens for Detroit Inc

Collection of new unused mittens to be distributed to those in need in the detroit, michigan and other nearby underserved cities.

Human Services
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Maine Children's Home for Little Wanderers

To build and strengthen families and their children, instilling hope for the future and a better quality of life.

—
6
Pediatric Foudnation of Michig Inc

To assist children

Health
7
Fostering Solutions

The purpose of the organization is to provide child welfare and supporting services to children, families, and individuals working and living in michigan.

Human Services
8
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation

Children's hospital of pittsburgh foundation is the sole fundraising arm of upmc children's hospital of pittsburgh.the foundation exists to provide financial support for the hospital's mission of improving the health and well-being of…

Health
9
Edward W Sparrow Hospital

Improving the health of the people in our communities by providing quality, compassionate care to everyone, every time.

Health
10
Grand Rapids Kiwanis Foundation
—
11
Mount Clemens Kiwanis Club Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
12
Matrix Human Services

Inspired by its heritage since 1906, matrix human services advocates for and services the most vulnerable in the metropolitan detroit community and empowers individiuals and families to enhance the quality of their lives and achieve self…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maggie's WIGS4KIDS of Michigan Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kiwanis of Michigan Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Various 500 or less: $20,938 · OtherVarious 500 or lessANTON ART CENTER: $11,975 · OtherANTON ART CENTERMISCELLANEOUS UNDER 500: $11,839 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS UNDER 500Michigan Kiwanis Foundation: $6,935 · OtherMichigan Kiwanis FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $6,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKiwanis Chidrens' Fund: $5,950 · OtherKiwanis Chidrens' FundMetro Park Splash Pad: $5,000 · OtherTCB YOUTH MENTORING: $3,600 · Other3464: $3,464 · Other+16 more: $21,233 · Other+16 moreMAGGIE'S WIGS4KIDS OF MICHIGAN INC: $17,200 · Human ServicesMAGGIE'S WIGS4KIDS OF …TURNING POINT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTURNING POINT INCYMCA of Metropolitan Detroit: $4,150 · Human ServicesYMCA of Metropolitan D…MACOMB FOSTER CLOSET: $1,800 · Human ServicesMACOMB FOSTER CLOSETPACKARD MOTOR CAR FOUNDATION: $4,750 · Arts & CultureMACOMB COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,750 · Arts & CultureNEWAY WORKS INC: $1,750 · EducationThe Discovery Center: $1,000 · EducationHEARTS FOR HOMES INC: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,250 · Philanthropy
Other$97,634Human Services$28,150Arts & Culture$7,500Education$2,750Housing & Shelter$2,000Philanthropy$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAGGIE'S WIGS4KIDS OF MICHIGAN INC: $17,200 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTURNING POINT INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPACKARD MOTOR CAR FOUNDATION: $4,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA of Metropolitan Detroit: $4,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMACOMB COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKIWANIS OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $2,400 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHEARTS FOR HOMES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMACOMB FOSTER CLOSET: $1,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEWAY WORKS INC: $1,750 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Discovery Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAGGIE'S WIGS4KIDS OF MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds PACKARD MOTOR CAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit ↗
  • Who funds MACOMB COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS FOR HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds MACOMB FOSTER CLOSET ↗
  • Who funds NEWAY WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Discovery Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mount Clemens Kiwanis Club Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mount Clemens Kiwanis Club Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mount Clemens Kiwanis Club Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mount Clemens Kiwanis Club Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mount Clemens Kiwanis Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph