Skip to content
Mott-Macleod Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mott-Macleod Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$273kArts & Culture$108kFood & Nutrition$48kPhilanthropy$36kYouth Development$35kHuman Services$21kRecreation & Sports$15kAnimals$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$827k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$10,336
CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION$10,000
PHILBROOK MUSEUM$7,625
LIFE SENIOR SERVICES$7,500
FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA$5,383
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA - VOLLEYBALL$5,000
SUSAN G KOMEN$5,000
THE PENCIL BOX$5,000
DELTA SIGMA PHI FOUNDATION$5,000
CITY YEAR TULSA$2,500
FILLING THE VOID$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN: $3k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $8k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTION: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$547k · 24 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
9

Total granted

$547k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+71%

Still filing today

38%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The University of Tulsa
    5× · 2021–2025 · $95k · revenue +6%
  • CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +163%
  • COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $46k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • PM
    PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART ENDOWMENT
    one grant, 2024 · $12k
  • MP
    MUDDY PAWS - PETS HELPING PEOPLE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • MA
    MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals
2
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
3
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
4
Tulsa School of Arts and Sciences

The mission of tsas middle and high school is to provide students a multi-strand liberal arts education in a safe, supportive, individualized and challenging school environment through a college preparatory curriculum.

Education
5
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
6
Tulsa Girls Art School Project Inc

Empowered by art, tulsa girls overcome barriers and discover life-changing purpose and possibilities.

Arts & Culture
7
Girl Scouts of Texas Oklahoma Plains Inc

Building girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
8
Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education
9
Tulsa Volunteers of America Senior Housing Inc

Provides housing to elderly persons under section 202 of the national housing act under agreement with the department of hud.

—
10
Kipp Tulsa Academy College Prep Inc

Kipp tulsa prepares students from educationally under-served neighborhoods in tulsa, ok with the academic, character and life skills necessary for success in college and the competitive world beyond.

Education
11
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
12
The Pet Food Pantry of Oklahoma City Inc

Reduce hunger in pets by providing free pet food and pet services to low income pet owners enabling them to keep their companion animal(s) with them. this includes providing routine vaccinations, spaying/neutering, pet supplies and shelter…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Tulsa; the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $56,146 · OtherCHI OMEGA FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY: $35,753 · OtherUNITED WAYGILCREASE MUSEUM: $30,000 · OtherGILCREASE MUSEUMUNIVERSITY OF TULSA ARTS AND SCIENCES: $27,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TULSA ARTS AND SCIENCESPHILBROOK MUSEUM: $25,101 · OtherPHILBROOK MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient: $25,064 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF TULSA PRESIDENTIAL FUND: $22,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TULSA PRESIDENTIAL FUNDPHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART ENDOWMENT: $12,030 · Other+16 more: $90,914 · Other+16 moreThe University of Tulsa: $94,610 · EducationThe University of TulsaTHE DELTA SIGMA PHI FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationTHE DELTA SIGMA PHI FOUNDAT…The Pencil Box Inc: $10,000 · EducationThe Pencil Box IncCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $45,876 · Food & NutritionTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $29,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $24,919 · Youth DevelopmentLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesFILLING THE VOID INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesResonance Center for Women Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Health
Other$325,008Education$139,610Food & Nutrition$45,876Arts & Culture$31,500Youth Development$24,919Human Services$13,500Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe University of Tulsa: $94,610 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $56,146 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $45,876 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DELTA SIGMA PHI FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $29,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $24,919 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Pencil Box Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFILLING THE VOID INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetResonance Center for Women Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPets Helping People Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTREETCATS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DELTA SIGMA PHI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Pencil Box Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds FILLING THE VOID INC ↗
  • Who funds Resonance Center for Women Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA BALLET THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA ↗
  • Who funds Pets Helping People Inc ↗
  • Who funds STREETCATS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gelvin FoundationThe Hardesty Family F…Tulsa Fdn Gen Fd Xxxx…The Oxley FoundationGrace & Franklin Bern…Maxine and Jack Zarro…The Sharna and Irvin …One Gas Foundation IncThe Anne and Henry Za…Judith and Jean Adams…Lobeck Taylor Family …Sanford P & Irene F B…
The Gelvin FoundationOK19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gelvin Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Tulsa Fdn Gen Fd Xxxxx8000 · The Oxley Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Judith and Jean Adams Charitable Foundation · Lobeck Taylor Family Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mott-Macleod Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mott-Macleod Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mott-Macleod Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home