Skip to content

· Private foundation

Moshe Eichler Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$4.7MEducation$169kHealth$36kHuman Services$15kPhilanthropy$12kArts & Culture$12kCivil Rights$3kMembership Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 39 grants below total $1,086,680, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,003,140 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $916,460 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $172k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $600k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Friends of Biala Yeshiva Inc.$250,000
Mesivta Tifereth Israel of Rizhin$168,500
Cong Hisachdus Avreichim of Bates$156,500
United Talmudic Academy of Monsey$116,210
Binyan Torah Inc.$106,000
Cong Yazorey of Boyan$52,500
Cong Beth Rochel School$28,000
Cong Beth Medresh Meor Yitzchok Inc.$25,320
Congregation V'Yoel Moshe D'Satmar$25,000
Congregation Ahavas Tzedukah Vchesed$22,680
Yeshiva Chsan Sofer Inc.$18,200
Beis Chasidei Goritz Inc.$11,500
Avihem$11,000
Cong Divrey Simche of Monroe$10,000
Kollel Ohula Shel Torah$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OZER DALIM FAMILY ASSISTANCE CHARIT: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 68 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

68 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 54 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
177

Total granted

$3.3M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+84%

Still filing today

3%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $573k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    Mesivta Tifereth Israel of Rizhin
    5× · 2019–2024 · $870k
  • YL
    Yetev Lev Jerusalem Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $500k
  • BT
    Binyan Torah Inc.
    3× · 2021–2024 · $358k

Funded once

  • RS
    REMSEN SHUL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $799k
  • CK
    Cong Khal Torath Chaim
    one grant, 2022 · $51k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
5
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
6
Yeshivat Leluv of Jerusalem Inc

Charitable work to help people in need

—
7
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
8
Sherit Isroel
—
9
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
10
Rashbi Tehillim Incorporated
Religion
11
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vaad Harabbanim L'inyanei Tzeduka Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Shalom Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 270 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mesivta Tifereth Israel of Rizhin: $870,300 · OtherMesivta Tifereth Israel of RizhinREMSEN SHUL INC: $799,439 · OtherREMSEN SHUL INCYetev Lev Jerusalem Inc: $500,000 · OtherYetev Lev Jerusalem IncBinyan Torah Inc.: $358,000 · OtherBinyan Torah Inc.American Friends of Biala Yeshiva Inc.: $250,000 · Other+181 more: $2,376,932 · Other+181 moreANENI WE ANSWER INC: $32,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $8,680 · ReligionKOLLEL DIVREI YOEL D'SATMAR BP: $1,000 · ReligionCHAYIM V CHESED: $500 · ReligionMIKVAH USA INC: $500 · ReligionAYZER LALIYA INC: $500 · ReligionYESHIVA TALPIOT INC: $6,500 · EducationAmerican Friends of Nishmas Yisroel Inc: $1,500 · EducationYESHIVA SHAAREI ARAZIM: $500 · EducationOZER DALIM FAMILY ASSISTANCE CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHE SHALOM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyBNEI LEVI: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentHATZOLOH EMS INC: $1,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$5,154,671Health$33,500Religion$11,180Education$8,500Human Services$4,000Philanthropy$1,000Youth Development$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANENI WE ANSWER INC: $32,500 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $8,680 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOZER DALIM FAMILY ASSISTANCE CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAmerican Friends of Nishmas Yisroel Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBNEI LEVI: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKOLLEL DIVREI YOEL D'SATMAR BP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHATZOLOH EMS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAYIM V CHESED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA SHAAREI ARAZIM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAYZER LALIYA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANENI WE ANSWER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY74.3× affinity66 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zichron Simcha Dsassov · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Rockstone · Ani Mamin Foundation · Chayim V Chesed · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Donors Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moshe Eichler Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moshe Eichler Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Moshe Eichler Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Moshe Eichler Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 270 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moshe Eichler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph