Skip to content

· Private foundation

Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$148k
Granted FY2023
55
Grants FY2023
—
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$552kReligion$398kHuman Services$117kFood & Nutrition$75kEducation$8kHealth$3kInternational$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 55 grants below total $34,878, the rows itemized in this filing. The $147,545 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $112,667 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k54 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$50
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Yeshiva Farm$20,000
Cong Bnai Shloima Zalman$4,256
Cong Bais Avraham D'Krula$2,600
A Time$1,000
BMG$1,000
Kew Gardens Synagogue$800
Bais Medrash Kerem Shlomo$643
Orlando Torah Academy$560
Yeshiva Gedolah of Washingtonville$500
BJX$430
Keren Yeshuah Israel Relief Fund$360
RCCS$298
RJJ$180
Khal Zichron Avrohom Yaakov$180
Beth Medrash Kovets Al Yad$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $25 → 15%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $18 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $18 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $18 → 11%TIVKAH LECHAIM INC: $50 → 14%TIKVAH LAYELED FOUNDATION INC: $36 → 17%TIKVAH LAYELED FOUNDATION INC: $18 → 17%BELEV ECHAD INC: $18 → 17%KEREN ZICHRON HENYA: $1k → 11%UNITED CHARITY INSTITUTIONS OD JERUSALEM: $10 → 14%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $384 → 11%THE DERECH SHALOM CENTER: $1k → 14%KEREN HACHOMESH: $180 → 20%BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD: $61 → 11%CHAI4EVER: $25 → 11%YISROEL RELIEF FUND: $18 → 11%AHAVAS TZEDOKO: $18 → 11%AHAVAS TZEDOKO: $18 → 11%TAG FLATBUSH - TECHNOLOGY AWARENESS GROUP: $54 → 20%TORAS MOSHE: $18 → 20%A TIME: $298 → 20%MISASKIM: $480 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%MISASKIM: $54 → 20%SHAAREI REFUAH: $18 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$476k · 139 repeat orgs$236k to everyone else

139 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 135 since wound down; 51 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

139
222

Total granted

$476k
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+16%

Still filing today

21%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesReligionInternationalPhilanthropyEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MISASKIM CORP
    2× · 2020–2022 · $534 · revenue +46%
  • OL
    OHR LEAMI INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $530 · revenue +9%
  • TF
    TZEDAKAH FUND
    2× · 2020–2022 · $518 · revenue +330%

Funded once

  • YO
    YESHIVA OF NITRA
    one grant, 2021 · $55k
  • SB
    SHUL BY THE GROVE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $43k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
5
Sherit Isroel
—
6
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
8
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
9
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
10
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
11
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
12
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Konfei Yona Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 416 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
81/85
Grantees still filing
59/85
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA TORAS CHESED: $95,000 · OtherYESHIVA TORAS CHESEDYESHIVA FARM SETTLEMENT INC: $55,000 · OtherYESHIVA FARM SETTLEMENT INCYESHIVA OF NITRA: $55,000 · OtherYESHIVA OF NITRAYESHIVA TORAS YISRAEL: $55,000 · OtherYESHIVA TORAS YISRAELSHUL BY THE GROVE INC: $42,560 · OtherSHUL BY THE GROVE INCIndividual grant recipient: $36,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherMASORES BAIS YAAKOV: $34,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $31,500 · Other+163 more: $246,750 · Other+163 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $479,050 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDDONORS FUND INC: $62,002 · Philanthropy+1 more: $300 · PhilanthropyCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $5,000 · EducationYESHIVA DERECH HATORAH: $1,890 · EducationSHEMIRAS SEDORIM INC: $1,000 · EducationTALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $500 · EducationBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $500 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationDerech Shalom Center Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesKEREN ZICHRON HENYA INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $534 · Human ServicesKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $384 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $360 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $298 · Human ServicesKEREN HACHOMESH INC: $180 · Human ServicesKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,144 · ReligionOHR LEAMI INC: $530 · ReligionMIKVAH USA INC: $360 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS MONTREAL INC: $360 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $359 · ReligionTORAS CHESED INC: $336 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $223 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $156 · ReligionNoam Shabbos Inc: $144 · ReligionBIKUR CHOLIM: $828 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $136 · HealthCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $122 · Health
Other$686,310Community Improvement$479,050Philanthropy$62,302Education$8,990Human Services$3,756Religion$3,612Health$1,086

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $479,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $62,002 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH HATORAH: $1,890 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,144 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHEMIRAS SEDORIM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDerech Shalom Center Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKEREN ZICHRON HENYA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM: $828 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $534 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHR LEAMI INC: $530 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTZEDAKAH FUND: $518 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $457 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $384 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS MONTREAL INC: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $359 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC: $336 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $298 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION: $298 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEER HAGOLAH INSTITUTES INC: $290 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $223 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HACHOMESH INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESER BNAI TORAH: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $156 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNoam Shabbos Inc: $144 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $136 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $122 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIVKAH LAUFER BIKUR CHOLIM: $118 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGENERAL ISRAEL ORPHAN HOME FOR GIRLS: $108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA DERECH HATORAH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zichron Chaim Charity FundNY79.7× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Basch Family Foundation · Donors Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 210%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr?

Find your warmest path to Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 416 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $181k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph